Comments Thread For: Sergey Kovalev-Andre Ward: Pure Offense vs. Pure Defense

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bronx7
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Mar 2010
    • 4503
    • 80
    • 0
    • 17,479

    #11
    ESPN staff picking a 50/50 fight as one sided 90/10 Ward. The prime Ward from SM tournament would be a 70/30 now after lots of rust he can't be 90/10 ESPN not giving Kovalev no props. Now it's a 50:50 60:40 the most. Best IQ last 10 years no order Floyd, Hopkins Ward

    Comment

    • hitking
      Undisputed Champion
      • May 2010
      • 11467
      • 444
      • 0
      • 36,048

      #12
      Originally posted by bronx7
      Kovalev as proved in Hopkins fight is not a wild brawler only controls distance uses jab. Ward bust guys up hurts them in clinches is tougher than guy thinks just no one punch ko power horrible article
      I think we (the boxing world) got a lil too excited about Kovalev's performance against Hopkins. Kovalev showes dimensions that a lotta people didn't think he had. But, he didn't have a lot in frontof him that night. Kovalev gets full credit for beating Hopkins in a manner that pretty much nobody has. But its easy to show dimensions when there's no resistance. I think the Chilemba fight was more of an indicator of what holes Kovalev has that can be exploited by Ward. Can Ward exploit those holes? Guess we'll find out in a couple hours. Everybody has a plan till they get the hell knocked outta them.

      Comment

      • The plunger man
        the minge monster
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Dec 2014
        • 9139
        • 1,021
        • 263
        • 67,551

        #13
        Both are hungry for this and hand on heart I cannot separate them whether the pure boxer beats the boxer puncher......I'm gonna go with kovalev by late round stoppage because of his natural advantage in power & size but it's really a tough f@ckin fight to call....may the best man win :-)))) let's get it on

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP