Comments Thread For: Groves: If Golovkin Comes To 168 - I Would Do a Job on Him!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Groves: If Golovkin Comes To 168 - I Would Do a Job on Him!

    Carl Froch this week dismissed coming out of retirement to face Golovkin next year. But Groves says he is ready to step into the ring with the Kazakh KO king. He said: "If there's a massive fight to be made against Golovkin and my world title fight cannot be made of course I would have it.
    [Click Here To Read More]
  • CaneloMaidana
    Banned
    • Apr 2013
    • 4430
    • 145
    • 1
    • 4,915

    #2
    Golovkin isn't man enough to move up. Remember Groves beat Murray but somehow Groves doesn't count.

    Comment

    • OctoberRed
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Aug 2006
      • 14247
      • 797
      • 295
      • 135,200

      #3
      No you won't. Once that chin gets hit, good night Groves.

      Comment

      • Beercules
        Lounge POTY '17
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Aug 2013
        • 65186
        • 4,941
        • 7,203
        • 950,179

        #4

        Comment

        • Redd Foxx
          Hittin' the heavy bag.
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Dec 2011
          • 22007
          • 1,180
          • 2,316
          • 1,257,197

          #5
          THIS is a fight I've been calling for. Groves gets worked but it would be 4 rounds of violence. Golovkin gets credit for moving up, fans get to see an entertaining fight, ratings would be solid. More importantly, gives Golovkin a chance to acclimate and setup a Jack/DeGale fight as well.

          Comment

          • boxingitis
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Sep 2013
            • 7110
            • 2,058
            • 18
            • 23,227

            #6
            Good thing Groves doesnt have excuses.

            Comment

            • CaneloMaidana
              Banned
              • Apr 2013
              • 4430
              • 145
              • 1
              • 4,915

              #7
              Originally posted by ИATAS
              lol of course you would post this. And immediately after Golovkin KOs Groves you would post about how much of a bum Groves is, glass chin, etc. Same old shit from a shit poster.
              Awww I insulted your boo.

              Comment

              • boxingitis
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Sep 2013
                • 7110
                • 2,058
                • 18
                • 23,227

                #8
                Originally posted by CaneloMaidana
                Golovkin isn't man enough to move up. Remember Groves beat Murray but somehow Groves doesn't count.
                Good things Canelo is Man enough to move up and doesnt starve himself.

                Comment

                • CaneloMaidana
                  Banned
                  • Apr 2013
                  • 4430
                  • 145
                  • 1
                  • 4,915

                  #9
                  Originally posted by boxingitis
                  Good things Canelo is Man enough to move up and doesnt starve himself.
                  No difference you fool

                  Comment

                  • CaneloMaidana
                    Banned
                    • Apr 2013
                    • 4430
                    • 145
                    • 1
                    • 4,915

                    #10
                    Originally posted by ИATAS
                    Nah, it's you're a broken record, always the same "coward", "not man enough" posts, get some new material maricón
                    Is Golovkin man enough to move up? Yes or no you coward. Chavez moved up. Why can't this fraud?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP