Hilariously commentated boxing vid

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Redd Foxx
    Hittin' the heavy bag.
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2011
    • 22007
    • 1,180
    • 2,316
    • 1,257,197

    #11
    Originally posted by _Maxi
    Why do you miss the point? why don't you mention your opinion on the 70+ clinches?
    Settle down little one, you're not being attacked. Pappa's got you. I was sharing some useful info about the idiot who created the vid. Not debating you. Just because someone responds to you doesn't mean it's time to lash out.

    Comment

    • _Maxi
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Feb 2015
      • 8978
      • 509
      • 718
      • 91,740

      #12
      Originally posted by Redd Foxx
      Settle down little one, you're not being attacked. Pappa's got you. I was sharing some useful info about the idiot who created the vid. Not debating you. Just because someone responds to you doesn't mean it's time to lash out.
      I know I'm not being attacked. Now what do you think about the 70+ clinches?

      Comment

      • mlac
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2014
        • 20337
        • 1,630
        • 1,486
        • 210,093

        #13
        Originally posted by _Maxi
        I know I'm not being attacked. Now what do you think about the 70+ clinches? cri cri...
        He says in another thread that clinches and holding are very different apparently

        Ward doesnt clinch according to this ****** so im guessing he thinks those 70+ clinches were not actually clinches and we DKSAB if we dont agree with him

        Comment

        • Redd Foxx
          Hittin' the heavy bag.
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Dec 2011
          • 22007
          • 1,180
          • 2,316
          • 1,257,197

          #14
          Originally posted by _Maxi
          I know I'm not being attacked. Now what do you think about the 70+ clinches?
          I didn't like the way Floyd clinched. It was a "get out of trouble" clinch rather than a "rough you up inside" clinch. In Floyd's defense, I will say that he wasn't as bad as Wlad and Hopkins who would hit and clinch over and over as a style of attack.

          Comment

          • Redd Foxx
            Hittin' the heavy bag.
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2011
            • 22007
            • 1,180
            • 2,316
            • 1,257,197

            #15
            Originally posted by mlac
            He says in another thread that clinches and holding are very different apparently

            Ward doesnt clinch according to this ****** so im guessing he thinks those 70+ clinches were not actually clinches and we DKSAB if we dont agree with him
            You really don't have any business discussing boxing with grown folks if you still don't understand the difference between fighting inside/in the clinch, and holding on to protect oneself from counters or to stall the action.

            Comment

            • mlac
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2014
              • 20337
              • 1,630
              • 1,486
              • 210,093

              #16
              Originally posted by Redd Foxx
              You really don't have any business discussing boxing with grown folks if you still don't understand the difference between fighting inside/in the clinch, and holding on to protect oneself from counters or to stall the action.


              In all seriousness, you are actually right.
              Diving in with your head, and then holding on, throwing a jab to the body, diving in with ur head to hold on, rinse and repeat is actually technically fantastic boxing and anyone that think's that is A) dirty or B) Illegal has absolutely no business talking boxing with us grown up's.

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP