Ummm should we compare resumes and opponents fought?
Didn't GGG refuse to move up to 168 and fight Ward? Didn't he say anyone from 154-168? The bold pretty much describes him instead if you ask me. He's the one who failed to step up.
When did Froch move up or down? Never. How do you fail to see this basic fact? They both fought the best they could at their division. GGG can't force Mws to fight him.
When did Froch move up or down? Never. How do you fail to see this basic fact? They both fought the best they could at their division. GGG can't force Mws to fight him.
His division was so stacked that he would have been seen as a coward for going up or down.
When did Froch move up or down? Never. How do you fail to see this basic fact? They both fought the best they could at their division. GGG can't force Mws to fight him.
Froch didn't have the need to move up. He had plenty of challenges at 168. Golovkin is talking about Froch being all talk and not stepping up but Froch did step up. Look at his resume.
Now let's look at Golovkin, he said anyone from 154-168, right? If there isn't anyone at 160 why did he not fight Ward at 168 instead of asking for catchweight? So, in Golovkin's own words, all talk and no step up.
Froch didn't have the need to move up. He had plenty of challenges at 168. Golovkin is talking about Froch being all talk and not stepping up but Froch did step up. Look at his resume.
Now let's look at Golovkin, he said anyone from 154-168, right? If there isn't anyone at 160 why did he not fight Ward at 168 instead of asking for catchweight? So, in Golovkin's own words, all talk and no step up.
How do YOU fail to see simple facts?
So Froch is more brave because he was lucky to get better fights in his own division? (which he lost two, btw)
And GGG is to blame because the duckers are duckers?
Comment