Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

HOLY SH** - Lloefler negotiating Golovkin vs Froch at Wembley

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Froch just got his nose fixed he ain't fighting. Unless his girl cheated on him or something like that and he needs to reprove himself.

    Honestly can't fault GGG doe. He's getting older every day. No one ranked up there high with him wants to fight him unless it's on some speculative future date a year from now or a fight or two from now. He's not gonna get credit fighting anyone willing to fight him anyway. Might as well fight for the most money he can get til the wheels fall off.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by don larryx View Post
      Leonard was not 39 now was he??

      terry norris got 0 credit for beating Leonard nor did Tyson for beating Holmes
      What the hell did you just type? Norris got no credit for beating Leonard? Are you fuqing insane? Norris win over Leonard basically made his career. He was the underdog with 3 losses, one by brutal KO.

      Tyson beating Holmes is considered one of his hallmark victories. Lift your fingers from the keyboard, pickup a history book on boxing and reeducate yourself, please.

      And Leonard was a 30 year old who used ******* which basically meant he was like 40 when it came to timing, coordination, and punch resistance.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by HanzGruber View Post
        if he moves up he should fight someone good and active, not a 40 yr old retired fighter for a payday
        newsflash, theres no killer at super middleweight. The best two fighters there struggled against ****ing lucian bute, the guy ggg sparked out. you and the other clowns would give GGG absolutely no credit if he beat one of the 168 guys. All yit would give you is more ammo to say hes got to fight kovalev/ward/stevenson to 'prove himself' cause hed be clsoer to 175

        Comment


        • #34
          I don't see how anyone could not like this fight. Who cares if Froch has been gone. He stays in great shape and is the much bigger man. I wanted this fight 2 years ago. Froch would win too.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by ComicDon View Post
            And what's your point again? We're talking retired fighters coming back for big fights, what they did afterwards means nothing in this conversation.



            Don't make me put you on my official bozo list friend for making bad arguments.
            it means everything, dolt.

            that is unless froch goes on and pulls a george foreman.

            the thing is, AGAIN, 3g sure did pick the worse possible move up opponent. the fact that his fans dont see this is hysterical.

            ward was right there.

            were not friends so do as you please.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by ComicDon View Post
              What the hell did you just type? Norris got no credit for beating Leonard? Are you fuqing insane? Norris win over Leonard basically made his career. He was the underdog with 3 losses, one by brutal KO.

              Tyson beating Holmes is considered one of his hallmark victories. Lift your fingers from the keyboard, pickup a history book on boxing and reeducate yourself, please.

              And Leonard was a 30 year old who used ******* which basically meant he was like 40 when it came to timing, coordination, and punch resistance.
              larrys just a sad bitter man, he'll distort any history and facts to ensure golovkin gets no praise

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by don larryx View Post
                Leonard was not 39 now was he??

                terry norris got 0 credit for beating Leonard nor did Tyson for beating Holmes
                0 fighters he mention got credit for this wins ;Hagler lost, SRL wasnt near 40 .This fight wont get made anyway .

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by -Antonio- View Post
                  I don't see how anyone could not like this fight. Who cares if Froch has been gone. He stays in great shape and is the much bigger man. I wanted this fight 2 years ago. Froch would win too.
                  these idiots get excited about the **** fights on pbc but arent intrigued by a fight like this. they arent real boxing fans

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by -Antonio- View Post
                    I don't see how anyone could not like this fight. Who cares if Froch has been gone. He stays in great shape and is the much bigger man. I wanted this fight 2 years ago. Froch would win too.
                    i highly doubt this happens. at least noot right away. froch will want a ''tune up'' fight. then 3g will get bogged down fighting guys in his weak div (ne will not entertain any other smw).

                    2 yrs ago froch manhandles 3g. now.....dont know what his reflexes look like.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by don larryx View Post
                      Why does his team target old ass fighters?? its not about legacy it is all about money...why not challenge a prime young champion??
                      You mean like Floyd Mayweather did?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP