Comments Thread For: Arum Admits He is 'Devastated' Over Donald Trump's Upset Win
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
That chilly Tuesday morning when 3000 Americans died wasnt a figment of anyone's imagination either. The fact that Congress voted on the 14th (including then Senator Clinton) to approve military action wasn't a figment of anyone's imagination either. The fact that ***** increased military action in Afghanistan wasn't a figment of anyone's imagination either. The fact that much of the recession was caused by the housing market practices, much of which were caused by a class action lawsuit, Buyacks v Robeson, which attorney ***** was a part of, wasn't a figment of anyone's imagination either. The fact that candidate ***** said in 2008 that he could decrease the deficit by half in his first term wasn't a figment of anyone's imagination either. The fact that Barack ***** was still blaming his predecessor 4 years after being on the job wasn't a figment of anyone's imagination either.Comment
-
Good post. Thank you. And also the fact that spending/debt during the ***** administration exceeded more than previous 40 Presidents before him combined. Its laughable how these ******** buy into this scam. And now the so-called ********s protesting in the city streets because their candidate didn't win. ******* ********s who don't believe in the ********ic process. Its a joke. Spoiled cry baby b**** spawned off by their ******* parents and professors. Unfortunately these facts aren't a figment of anyone's imagination either.That chilly Tuesday morning when 3000 Americans died wasnt a figment of anyone's imagination either. The fact that Congress voted on the 14th (including then Senator Clinton) to approve military action wasn't a figment of anyone's imagination either. The fact that ***** increased military action in Afghanistan wasn't a figment of anyone's imagination either. The fact that much of the recession was caused by the housing market practices, much of which were caused by a class action lawsuit, Buyacks v Robeson, which attorney ***** was a part of, wasn't a figment of anyone's imagination either. The fact that candidate ***** said in 2008 that he could decrease the deficit by half in his first term wasn't a figment of anyone's imagination either. The fact that Barack ***** was still blaming his predecessor 4 years after being on the job wasn't a figment of anyone's imagination either.Comment
-
Why do you keep talking about Benghazi and choose to ignore the 3,000+ lives lost on 9/11, a tragedy in which we let the enemy attack us for 90 minutes on our own soil and all that George W. Bush did, was hide in his plane the whole day.
Explain you effing cowards?
Within four years, another ********ic president will come to the White House and pick up the pieces ad destruction of the American nation, once more, just like Barak ***** did in 2008 after George W. Bush left.
But you forgot all about that...Right?
Four years are an insignificant amount of time, and they go fast...Remember that.
All you angry bitter whiners did was to elect ********ically a Narcissistic,con artist wanna be dictator out of anger , you will pay for it, and the price will be very high.
You didn't screw Hillary, you screwed yourselves.
ADDITIONALLY, ALL OF YOU FINALLY SHOW YOUR TRUE COLORS!!!!
Like the bitter ignorants say:
"God allowed Donald Trump to become president of the USA..."
Then again...God has many different ways to punish a nation for its ******ity!!!Comment
-
Answer the question. I'm playing the devil's advocate and no-one can say that "no - if Russia put 300,000 troops in Mexico (or Cuba) then the US would just sit idly by and allow it" - there'd be a threat and people like you would probably be the first marching in front of the White House demanding that the President defend the rights of the USA - whoever was President.
Yet flip it around and all is OK. No problem for NATO TO PUT 300K troops in the Baltic states to defend them. NATO is an out-dated organization in need of an enemy to justify its existence. Could be nothing worse for them than if Russia and the US became best buddies. And nothing worse for the oligarchy with interests in maintaining the military industrial complex. Why spend hundreds of billions on a new F35 if peace breaks out? You think that money isn't spent with huge profits meted out, without kickbacks going back to the politicians taking the decisions? Do you really? How about all those hundreds of billions get invested into schools, hospitals, infrastructure and recreation? You'd probably be a beneficiary as opposed to a helpless witness when WW3 breaks out.
Since when has the USA ever considered Syria a sphere of influence? It hasn't. It was always recognized as a pro-Soviet(Russian) state. Again, what would happen if there would be a civil war in Mexico and Russia started bombing one of the sides?Comment
-
Answer the question. I'm playing the devil's advocate and no-one can say that "no - if Russia put 300,000 troops in Mexico (or Cuba) then the US would just sit idly by and allow it" - there'd be a threat and people like you would probably be the first marching in front of the White House demanding that the President defend the rights of the USA - whoever was President.
Yet flip it around and all is OK. No problem for NATO TO PUT 300K troops in the Baltic states to defend them. NATO is an out-dated organization in need of an enemy to justify its existence. Could be nothing worse for them than if Russia and the US became best buddies. And nothing worse for the oligarchy with interests in maintaining the military industrial complex. Why spend hundreds of billions on a new F35 if peace breaks out? You think that money isn't spent with huge profits meted out, without kickbacks going back to the politicians taking the decisions? Do you really? How about all those hundreds of billions get invested into schools, hospitals, infrastructure and recreation? You'd probably be a beneficiary as opposed to a helpless witness when WW3 breaks out.
Since when has the USA ever considered Syria a sphere of influence? It hasn't. It was always recognized as a pro-Soviet(Russian) state. Again, what would happen if there would be a civil war in Mexico and Russia started bombing one of the sides?
the USA has meddled in world-affairs far too often
most of their military action is completely unjustified
building military bases all around the world can be seen as nothing other than military aggressionComment
-
Comment