Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Which is worse? Floyd vs Pac (2010) or Alvarez vs Golovkin (2016)?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View Post
    ''why would you walk away from 40million dollars on the table just not to give some blood?!.'' - Atlas (2010)
    That was an assumption...the offer was 50/50 tho they were splitting everything right down the middle

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by don larryx View Post
      That was an assumption...the offer was 50/50 tho they were splitting everything right down the middle
      so theoritically what would've been the numbers, revenue, PPV, in your opinion?

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View Post
        so theoritically what would've been the numbers, revenue, PPV, in your opinion?
        Man i dont know...all i know is the offer was 50/50

        Comment


        • #14
          In no world will 40 million be worse than 10 million for 36 minutes of work.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by don larryx View Post
            Man i dont know...all i know is the offer was 50/50
            So which was better? 40million or 50/50. Pac and Brian Kenny broadcasted via ESPN that 15 days before the fight was not possible!

            So which was the excuse? Money or WADA!?

            Comment


            • #16
              They're both bad but we're in the present right now and I have to take into consideration that Canelo fought how many times at 155lbs and then dropped his 160lbs WBC belt at the thought of fighting GGG then low balls an offer of 10 million dollars A YEAR IN ADVANCE!!!

              At the very least Floyd would have set up the fight with Pacquiao to be the next one in line not a year in advance if he took the offer which was low balling as well.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Mr.DagoWop View Post
                In no world will 40 million be worse than 10 million for 36 minutes of work.
                It was worse for the fans though we were rejected the chance of seeing prime vs prime best fighters at the time go up against each other because of Floyd.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by Thraxox View Post
                  No, Pacquiao turned down a 50-50 fight from Mayweather because the blood testing was too close from the fight. He was drained when he fought Morales the first time because they took two ounces of blood from him 1 day before the match.

                  "Well, he now agrees to a 14 day in? Well he got the chance to accept that, but right now I want it just a day before the match!"

                  - Floyd Mayweather.
                  Out of the 5-6 excuses and blatant lies told by Bob arum - you pick "cut off dates".

                  Typical pact@rd.

                  Sorry team Pac already admitted years later the whole "drug testing thing" was their fault.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by Red Cyclone View Post
                    It was worse for the fans though we were rejected the chance of seeing prime vs prime best fighters at the time go up against each other because of Floyd.
                    I agree we were robbed but I don't blame it only on Floyd. It takes two to negotiate, some of the blame lies with Pac.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View Post
                      So which was better? 40million or 50/50. Pac and Brian Kenny broadcasted via ESPN that 15 days before the fight was not possible!

                      So which was the excuse? Money or WADA!?
                      Manny walked over drug testing, that is common knowledge

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP