I dunno about 40%, but for sure that's a better starting point than 0 and not willing to budge. They don't want it till Sept next year, you'd hope 160 is not a concession by then. It's for 3-4 Mw belts anyway, a CW would be weak.
Loeffler said they wanted a split like Pacquiao got with Mayweather. Pacquiao got 40%. Pacquiao was at similar level drawing power with Mayweather. Golovkin is nowhere near Canelo. They're delusional.
Can you post a live link, cant acces from my phone...
It's Canelo saying he would never budge from 154 for Floyd. He also said he wouldn't budge from 155 for Golovkin to which Sanchez / Golovkin responded it was 160 or nothing. This is the kind of ish that normally gets sorted in negotiations.
Loeffler said they wanted a split like Pacquiao got with Mayweather. Pacquiao got 40%. Pacquiao was at similar level drawing power with Mayweather. Golovkin is nowhere near Canelo. They're delusional.
So GBP should counter with 70/30, settle on a fair 65/35 for example. But not budging from a flat fee is just more duck tactics
It's Canelo saying he would never budge from 154 for Floyd. He also said he wouldn't budge from 155 for Golovkin to which Sanchez / Golovkin responded it was 160 or nothing. This is the kind of ish that normally gets sorted in negotiations.
A link from 2013???
I will have to look at it in the morning on my laptop..
Thanks anyways..
35% isn't fair either. Golovkin deserves no more than 25%.
Ok then they should counter with that but not zero. But I'll remind you that Canelo just did 200k per Glaser, and conceded 55% to Cotto in upside just cause he brought a belt. Ggg brings 3 belts, and Canelos balls, if he wants those back
Ok then they should counter with that but not zero. But I'll remind you that Canelo just did 200k per Glaser, and conceded 55% to Cotto in upside just cause he brought a belt. Ggg brings 3 belts, and Canelos balls, if he wants those back
So because Canelo bent over for Mayweather and Cotto he should bend over for Golovkin? All 3 of those guys did the bending to get in position to call their own shots, it's Golovkins turn to bend.
So because Canelo bent over for Mayweather and Cotto he should bend over for Golovkin? All 3 of those guys did the bending to get in position to call their own shots, it's Golovkins turn to bend.
Who said anything about bending over? Curb your fantasies. Canelo never took a flat fee for a huge ppv, nobody does
So because Canelo bent over for Mayweather and Cotto he should bend over for Golovkin? All 3 of those guys did the bending to get in position to call their own shots, it's Golovkins turn to bend.
Tweet
Comment