Comments Thread For: De La Hoya: Golovkin is The One Who is Running - Not Canelo!

[robertzimmerman]

epic response LMAO !!

Wow!

Let's hope she doesn't read any of your posts.

Ha!

[robertzimmerman]

why are you running around casting aspersions over a "could"?

link ?

Cotto made 12mil TOTAL, for MAYWEATHER.

Cotto > Golovkin AND Canelo LMAO

It's a realistic figure dumba$$.

Nobody cares what Cotto made against Floyd.

[robertzimmerman]

In boxing (PPV) terms, that is exactly what GGG is.....

* never had a truly meaningful fight
* desperately trying to establish himself as a PPV fighter

Golovkin is basically a prospect LMAO

Golovkin sells 100 PPV's, Canelo sells 400 PPV's

which is 80/20

Golovkin wants to play hardball-maths-professor with Jacobs, but then he wants the much more popular Canelo to throw him a bone.....

only a lil'G-string would support double-standards like that

There is no double standards you fool.

If you can't see the difference between GG-Canelo and GG-Jacobs, then you're even dumber than I first thought.

GG has just done 500,000 buys.

His days of selling 100,000 buys are over.

His popularity is gaining all of the time.

You can quote as many figures as you like. The fact is, without a big name opponent, Canelo doesn't do huge numbers. And there's nobody out there that could give Canelo the payday that GG can. Add those things together and take into account that Canelo is moving up to a division where GG has 3 of the 4 belts, you'll realise that Canelo will have to fight him at some point if he stays undefeated.

[davef]

I think canelo makes more vs brook than vs golovkin

Uk fans will eat it up brook vs the guy whos lucky he didnt face a murder trial knockin khan out, the guy whos faced floyd, the guy who can possibly beat golovkin, the Mexican fans buying ppv and tickets and the fact brook will take less than 10 million

[robertzimmerman]

aboutfkntime,

Saunders, Lemieux, Eubank, Jacobs!

1. None of those guys give him the payday that GG would.

2. Fights against Jacobs and Saunders would only be relevant if GG hadn't already beaten them. Once they're out of the equation, then what?

all of the guys who Golovkin should fight, but won't

Golovkin has failed to make fights with all of those guys..... he has literally no options available..... ni fact he already fk'd-up most of those fights.

it is amusing that you think Canelo has no options at middleweight, despite the fact that he has waaaaay more options than Golovkin..... and yet let me guess, Golovkin should definitely stay at 160, right?

Won't fight, or can't fight?

No, Canelo doesn't have any great options at MW.

Again, Saunders and Jacobs would only be options if they'd either beaten GG or if they hadn't already fought him at the time Canelo fought them. Other than that, there would be zero interest in those fights.

Lemieux has already been beaten by GG and he isn't a big name.

Who else is there?

He'll be leaving JMW and he can't fight at SMW.

Unless any of the top JMW's move up, who does he fight?

Canelo is currently in negotiations with Jacobs, and he has the option of moving up to SMW.

His short term options are much better than Canelo's.

[robertzimmerman]

and yet, it won't happen.....

Golovkin didn't call Ward's " bluff "..... he didn't call Lara's "bluff"..... and he won't call Jacobs/Saunders "bluff" by offering them decent money either

and you of course, will continue to blame everyone else

I didn't realise you possessed psychic powers.

Why would he have called Ward's bluff when he was about to unify the MW division, and he was awaiting on the outcome of the Cotto-Canelo fight that he was the mandatory for?

Regarding Lara, Lara's own manager has stated that they're comfortable at JMW for the time being, but Loeffler has met with Haymon to discuss the possibility of a fight in the future.

[aboutfkntime]

It's a realistic figure dumba$$.

Nobody cares what Cotto made against Floyd.

I think I see the problem LMAO

[aboutfkntime]

There is no double standards you fool.

If you can't see the difference between GG-Canelo and GG-Jacobs, then you're even dumber than I first thought.

GG has just done 500,000 buys.

His days of selling 100,000 buys are over.

His popularity is gaining all of the time.

You can quote as many figures as you like. The fact is, without a big name opponent, Canelo doesn't do huge numbers. And there's nobody out there that could give Canelo the payday that GG can. Add those things together and take into account that Canelo is moving up to a division where GG has 3 of the 4 belts, you'll realise that Canelo will have to fight him at some point if he stays undefeated.

Fk off Romeo LMAO

Kell Brook just did 500k buys..... and UK PPV's = approximately half when compared to the US market.

Golovkin fought Brook in the UK because Brook is more popular over there than Golovkin is in the US.

[robertzimmerman]

look what happens when I change the names LMFAO

Very funny, but we already know all about GG's resume and his slow start since moving to the U.S.

We already know that Canelo is more popular and sells more PPV's. It's not new information. But my post highlights that a lot of guys like yourself need a reality check when it comes to Canelo. He's not the big star that you all perceive him to be and he's fortunate that he's had the opportunity to fight guys like Floyd. If you do some research, you'll realise that he doesn't deserve anywhere near the 75% that some of you clowns claim. It's laughable.

[robertzimmerman]

Canelo was willing to do what is necessary to make a meaningful/super-fight..... just like Hopkins did with Hoya/Trinidad/etc..... unlike Golovkin

oh, and Canelo got paid for taking those fights, unlike Golovkin

So dropping the belt to fight Liam Smith is your definition of him doing whatever possible to try and make the biggest fight out there?

I've got to hand it to you. You're an entertainer.