Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The beasts from the east- usyk, lomachenko, golovkin, beterbiev, kovalev

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The beasts from the east- usyk, lomachenko, golovkin, beterbiev, kovalev

    The changing landscape in boxing means that eastern europe is estabilishing itself as a powerhouse, with the success it has in the amatuers now translating to success in the pro's. Which fighter out of those listed do you feel is going to be remembered as the most successful? Will any of them be 'exposed' in the coming years? Or is there any other eastern european boxer who i havent mentioned that possesses the potential for greatness? Why is this region suddenly producing such a high calibre of boxers? Please discuss...

  • #2
    Originally posted by bigdramashow View Post
    The changing landscape in boxing means that eastern europe is estabilishing itself as a powerhouse, with the success it has in the amatuers now translating to success in the pro's. Which fighter out of those listed do you feel is going to be remembered as the most successful? Will any of them be 'exposed' in the coming years? Or is there any other eastern european boxer who i havent mentioned that possesses the potential for greatness? Why is this region suddenly producing such a high calibre of boxers? Please discuss...
    Idk where are you from but saying suddenly in this situation is not correct or Good,Former USSR have rich amatour boxing history and producent many medalist and great fighters,they just couldnt fight in USA during Cold War.Moscow is a capitol of former USSR boxing with best trainers.They wont dominate but they will be a force in boxing for sure.

    you forgot about Trojanowski

    Academy of boxing in Moscow is amazing place,saw povetkin training there, if anybody will be in Russia vist it.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by bigdramashow View Post
      The changing landscape in boxing means that eastern europe is estabilishing itself as a powerhouse, with the success it has in the amatuers now translating to success in the pro's. Which fighter out of those listed do you feel is going to be remembered as the most successful? Will any of them be 'exposed' in the coming years? Or is there any other eastern european boxer who i havent mentioned that possesses the potential for greatness? Why is this region suddenly producing such a high calibre of boxers? Please discuss...
      The mexicans were supposed to take over
      The puerto ricans were supposed to take over

      Now

      The Eastern Europeans are supposed to take over.

      If YOUNG established boxing nations like Mexico and Puerto Rico can't take over...... then surely an OLD population of E Europeans ain't taking over shi.t.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Kigali View Post
        The mexicans were supposed to take over
        The puerto ricans were supposed to take over

        Now

        The Eastern Europeans are supposed to take over.

        If YOUNG established boxing nations like Mexico and Puerto Rico can't take over...... then surely an OLD population of E Europeans ain't taking over shi.t.
        He didn't say 'taking over' he said 'establishing itself as a powerhouse' which it kinda is - courtesy of a rich and successful amateur program dating back many years. Adapting to the pro game has taken a good while but I think with signings of the newer generation of successful amateurs by all the major US promoters, we'll be hearing plenty about guys with too many Ks and Vs in their names for the foreseeable.

        Comment


        • #5
          Those "beasts from the East" have collectively beaten NOBODY.

          Comment


          • #6
            Do you follow anyone except ex soviet boxers ?

            Comment


            • #7
              Stalin put a ban on boxing making it illegal. Boxing wasn't legalized in that region until the fall of the Soviet Union in 1993.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by SouthPawHitman View Post
                Stalin put a ban on boxing making it illegal. Boxing wasn't legalized in that region until the fall of the Soviet Union in 1993.
                Its not true unless you are talking about proffesional boxing,its true for China doe ,boxing was banned there,untill Deng Xiaoping unbanned it.

                It was amateur boxing in USSR but they was fighting with no headgear and with normal gloves on championships,boxing was allways very popular in russian culture and from my knowladge it was never banned.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Nay_Sayer View Post
                  Those "beasts from the East" have collectively beaten NOBODY.
                  ...and most of them are old....even the young ones move like they're old.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by bigdramashow View Post
                    The changing landscape in boxing means that eastern europe is estabilishing itself as a powerhouse, with the success it has in the amatuers now translating to success in the pro's. Which fighter out of those listed do you feel is going to be remembered as the most successful? Will any of them be 'exposed' in the coming years? Or is there any other eastern european boxer who i havent mentioned that possesses the potential for greatness? Why is this region suddenly producing such a high calibre of boxers? Please discuss...
                    Why did you leave off Provodnikov, Postol, and Gradovich?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP