Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Right now today at 154 Pacquiao beats GGG

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Originally posted by Canelo and GGG View Post
    Cotto was Jabing with manny early,but in mid rounds he make mistakes and started to trade stiupid and never recovered,we dont know how would be GGGs chin in Pac size cuse Pac had serious pop in his best waights,If chin can hold up ,i can see GGG winning by UD but fighting with Pac can be weird you get hope ,then you make 1 mistake and everything is going to hell in this moment.

    Im familiar with unpopular opinions,thats why i asked about breakdown from you,i was picking Fury from begining to win over Wlad,people on Polish forum laught at me but i trust my skills to read boxing,Fury was just all wrong for Wlad,

    one more thing,Floyd can defend and stay in the pocket,i dont think GGG could pull of something like this against puncher as fast as Pacman and his footwork is good but he cant just jump on bicycle ,Pac man angles and footwork will get to him.
    Miguel is shorter and has a shorter reach. He has to get near Manny to touch him. The extra 3inch reach allows GGG to work on the outside. If Manny goes back straight after scoring he will be in far more trouble with the longer armed opponent.

    I disagree. Manny's footwork is not great though his style is effective. Manny has problem with movement IMO. He wont need to fight like Floyd to win, he can jab and move like morales did and control the fight with the jab.

    I thought Floyd's jab frustrated an neutralized manny. GGG's could do same but the added power would make it an effective weapon.

    I'm not suggesting Manny wouldn't score and win rounds. I just think its a bad matchup.

    Comment


    • #72
      Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
      Miguel is shorter and has a shorter reach. He has to get near Manny to touch him. The extra 3inch reach allows GGG to work on the outside. If Manny goes back straight after scoring he will be in far more trouble with the longer armed opponent.

      I disagree. Manny's footwork is not great though his style is effective. Manny has problem with movement IMO. He wont need to fight like Floyd to win, he can jab and move like morales did and control the fight with the jab.

      I thought Floyd's jab frustrated an neutralized manny. GGG's could do same but the added power would make it an effective weapon.

      I'm not suggesting Manny wouldn't score and win rounds. I just think its a bad matchup.
      I dont agree that Mannys footwork is bad,he is chaning angles and distract you with it also covers distance good,Morales was winning mostly with right hand lead,and he paid for it(that was one handed pac doe).GGG does not move like floyd,he try to cotrol you with hard jab,but its slow jab ,Pac could beat him to the punch often.I thnik that GGG cant fight in the pocket and he would need it,thats why he loses IMO but i see your points.

      Comment


      • #73
        Originally posted by Canelo and GGG View Post
        we talked about same size fight so GGG wont be taller,but i think GGG wouldnt cuse him problems like Floyd,GGG is more static fighter with no head movement.
        same size fight lol wtf are you on about, cant just shrink people for fantasy fights. floyd mayweather probably beats anthony joshua if joshua was 70 kg and 5ft 8

        Comment


        • #74
          Size eventually matters unfortunately. Pac today is leagues above him in a p4p sense though.

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by bigdramashow View Post
            same size fight lol wtf are you on about, cant just shrink people for fantasy fights. floyd mayweather probably beats anthony joshua if joshua was 70 kg and 5ft 8
            we was just talking about same size in our disscusion,nothing serious

            Comment


            • #76
              Originally posted by Canelo and GGG View Post
              we was just talking about same size in our disscusion,nothing serious
              fair enough, sorry i didnt mean to come across so aggressive in my reply lol, just reading it back. just thought it was a bit strange thats all

              Comment


              • #77
                Originally posted by bigdramashow View Post
                fair enough, sorry i didnt mean to come across so aggressive in my reply lol, just reading it back. just thought it was a bit strange thats all
                hahah.this fight have no sens,so disccusion on this fight in normal size is sensless

                Comment


                • #78
                  Larry, this is crazy.

                  Comment


                  • #79


                    Look at the size difference I mean seriously, is this what boxing has turned into, Silly Match Ups in which guys have to go 2 Divisions down to fight a guy whom to be honest probably shouldn't even be fighting at 147. Bob just saying what ever to sell that Pacquiao vs Vargas fight clearly!

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      the 2009 version had a good chance, but don't know about this one

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP