MM: Canelo vs Showtime Porter

[Tony Trick-Pony]

I like this fight. Would definitely be a fun war to watch. Porter would be right in Canelo's face all night. Canelo would catch him with good counters. Would be interesting to see who got hurt and went down if either did at all. Two warriors with two interesting styles. I'd love to see this.

[Larry the boss]

Canelo batters him

[Larry the boss]

if porter bulks up well, porter wins. And i genuinely mean that, its not some anti canelo comment. Porter is a really good world class fighter, on another night he could have wins against thurman and brook and be right up there p4p, the fights were that close.

Porter has no defense and swings wildly..Canelo would eat him for breakfast

[GOD-FR33]

Smh...

Smh once again. Why don't you guys educate yourselves more before posting threads and what not. Porter has never been to 154/155lbs before. So, why is this even being considered? Common sense should tell you that by looking at his frame, it wouldn't be wise to put any more muscle onto his body. I feel the same about Bradley. Porter gets KTFO by Canelo and Bradley gets KTFO by Cotto at 154lbs. What is wrong with you idiots???????

You guys hate on Canelo so much that you think a B Level fighter like Porter can even go 8 rounds with him??? Based on what? Canelo is too fast, too big, too strong, and too smart. Period. Size matters in boxing and it always has. Size negates skill.

[NearHypnos]

The problem is that Porter would try to bully Canelo into the ropes and Canelo is honestly really f ucking good off the ropes and would rip counters and uppers at Porter. Porter would also likely eat huge shots trying to even cover the distance he needs to make tk try and be effective...and even when he gets in he's likely not in much better shape once he's out of mid range.

Look at the Kirkland fight...it would probably be a near replica imo. I like Porter a ton but Canelo is naturally a bad matchup. Canelo is just flat out better to be honest...size aside.


Lets not let hate cloud our judgement. Canelo really is in another class compared to Porter.

[Larry the boss]

Smh once again. Why don't you guys educate yourselves more before posting threads and what not. Porter has never been to 154/155lbs before. So, why is this even being considered? Common sense should tell you that by looking at his frame, it wouldn't be wise to put any more muscle onto his body. I feel the same about Bradley. Porter gets KTFO by Canelo and Bradley gets KTFO by Cotto at 154lbs. What is wrong with you idiots???????

You guys hate on Canelo so much that you think a B Level fighter like Porter can even go 8 rounds with him??? Based on what? Canelo is too fast, too big, too strong, and too smart. Period. Size matters in boxing and it always has. Size negates skill.

Porter use to fight at 154

[John Locke]

Porter's my guy but Canelo would hurt him

[Bjl12]

if porter bulks up well, porter wins. And i genuinely mean that, its not some anti canelo comment. Porter is a really good world class fighter, on another night he could have wins against thurman and brook and be right up there p4p, the fights were that close.

Brook mostly dominated Porter. I had it like ~9-3 or 8-4. It was a sloppy fight and everything clean was from Brook. Porter had lots of partial lands, but not a single significant punch.

[boliodogs]

Porter comes to fight. He charges in hard and fast with both hands blazing. I think that would get him KOed by Canelo fairly quickly. He was badly hurt by a Broner left hook and Canelo hits a hell of a lot harder than Broner with either hand and any punch. Canelo is a much better and faster handed boxer than Porter and he has an iron jaw. Porter can't hurt him and he can't outbox him so he can't win. Canelo would beat him if he was a welterweight but he is a big Jr middleweight so that just makes his job easier.Just my honest opinion.

[Lester Tutor]

Porter would be a Kirkland redo