Tweet
Some people claim that if Ward was from any country other then America that his fights wouldn't even be televised. I was wondering if that were indeed the case by comparing his entertainment value to the only other notable p4p fighter that fights in obscurity. So if a Ward and Rigondeaux fight was on at the same time and their opponents were both rated the same, whose fight would you be more likely to watch?
-
-
Which is more entertaining, watching paint dry or grass grow? Lol. Seriously, Id give the advantage to Ward. He may clinch a lot, but at least he isn't running around the ring like Usain Bolt and getting booed by the crowd. Im not a big fan of either, but can appreciate a wrestling match to a track neet anyday -
Rigondeaux's fight on the Cotto/Canelo undercard was one of the most disgraceful performances I've ever seen from a reigning world champion, on the other hand, though, unlike Ward, Rigo can punch.Comment
-
Rigondeaux is only boring until he gets insulted ( or hit by a fighter he deems lesser then him) watch the Amagasa fight... Rigo can go off, ward on the other hand doesn't lose composure even when hit and doesn't turn it up.Comment
-
I'd much rather watch Ward. He's more versatile. Rigo is brilliant at what he does, but he still just does the one thing. Ward will beat you up inside and outside.Comment
Comment