Who else can GGG fight for 10 million?
Collapse
-
-
As per the wbo, saunders has to fight 2 mandos before negotiating with ggg, guess who will be one of those mandos? At the end of the day the smith fight is going to give canelo his title shot vs saunders and even more leverage at the negotiations vs ggg, i have to admit i never saw this coming when the smith fight was signed...Comment
-
If I think Canelo deserves more than $10 million (let alone a ****ing flat fee) in a fight with GGG, then in what world would I criticize him for rejecting an offer I think he should?Comment
-
Lol are you dumb? How the hell does it not change the point? Think about what you just said.
If I think Canelo deserves more than $10 million (let alone a ****ing flat fee) in a fight with GGG, then in what world would I criticize him for rejecting an offer I think he should?Comment
-
You're a real ****ing genius.Comment
-
What I am saying is that you would be persecuting Canelo for not taking the 10 mill. I am responding to you saying that you already said Canelo deserves more than 10 mill by saying that it is easy to say that when you don't have to defend it (ie Canelo isn't in that position).Comment
-
Lol it isn't even a diss when you say "mother" it just makes you sound like a rich preppy 17 year old who went to private school his entire life. Who tf says mother?
Next time say "yo mama's a hoe" or some shlt like that. Don't go trying to explain it writing a 5 sentence perfect paragraph.Last edited by Mr.MojoRisin'; 10-29-2016, 03:40 PM.Comment
-
Comment
-
You're really this ****** huh?
What I am saying is that you would be persecuting Canelo for not taking the 10 mill. I am responding to you saying that you already said Canelo deserves more than 10 mill by saying that it is easy to say that when you don't have to defend it (ie Canelo isn't in that position).
You're trying to make it sound like my stance (which I said he shouldn't) on Canelo taking a flat fee of $10 million has no merit because Canelo isn't in that position. Yet you're acting like your stance (that I would be hypocritical and push for Canelo to take the flat fee) in the EXACT same situation has some sort of meaning (when Canelo also isn't in that position).
You're trying to parade that I would push for Canelo to take a flat fee because it's easy for YOU to say it because Canelo isn't in that position.
If I said Canelo doesn't take a flat fee, you'd basically dismiss what I said because it's not the real scenario. Yet if I said Canelo should take a flat fee in the EXACT same hypothetical scenario, you wouldn't dismiss it simply because it falls in line with what you want (to try and make me look hypocritical).Last edited by Raonic; 10-29-2016, 03:23 PM.Comment
-
Are you ******ed? Exactly what I said...
You're trying to make it sound like my stance (which I said he shouldn't) on Canelo taking a flat fee of $10 million has no merit because Canelo isn't in that position. Yet you're acting like your stance (that I would be hypocritical and push for Canelo to take the flat fee) in the EXACT same situation has some sort of meaning (when Canelo also isn't in that position).
You're trying to parade that I would push for Canelo to take a flat fee because it's easy for YOU to say it because Canelo isn't in that position.
If I said Canelo doesn't take a flat fee, you'd basically dismiss what I said because it's not the real scenario. Yet if I said Canelo should take a flat fee in the EXACT same hypothetical scenario, you wouldn't dismiss it simply because it falls in line with what you want (to try and make me look hypocritical).Comment
Comment