Who has the Better Resume? Bradley or Danny Garcia

[Squ□redCircle34]

Desert Storm has this, the Marquez win is better than the Morales win!

Although Garcia has a lil more edge in the badass win against Matthysse while Bradley's win against Provodnikov is up there too!!

Would've been interesting to see who's win a 140 tournament of..

Khan
Matthysse
Garcia
Bradley

[bojangles1987]

You sure? he definitely wasn't in the 2nd fight.

edit: did the odds change once Morales didn't make weight?

http://www.badlefthook.com/2012/3/24...bo-boxing-news

It's after he came in overweight, but says in the article that Morales was already an underdog before that.

[The Big Dunn]

he beat decent fighters but he's definitely not hof material like some people are claiming on nsb. people are giving him way too much credit for an older version of marquez at ww.....a younger marquez is deemed not credible at ww by many of these posters so how can an older verison be credible.

I think he may get into the HOF even though IMO he shouldn't.

[Xi_]

career was already winding down.

same when bradley fought rulsan.

lucas had just destroyed lamont pederson......he was coming of his best performance.....that makes zero sense.

[WesternChamp]

He didn't beat Manny and was favored against JMM. Morales, Khan and Matts were heavy favorites over Danny.

I gave the edge to Tim, nothing to discuss.

no, marquez was slightly favored over bradley.

"It's Marquez(55-6-1, 40 KOs), who's been installed as as slightly favorite, as likely any man coming off a destructive six-round knockout of Manny Pacquiao would be".

[WesternChamp]

lucas had just destroyed lamont pederson......he was coming of his best performance.....that makes zero sense.

and before that he lost to judah. yeah zab judah.

[The Big Dunn]

http://www.badlefthook.com/2012/3/24...bo-boxing-news

It's after he came in overweight, but says in the article that Morales was already an underdog before that.

Yeah, I saw this. The author seems to be giving his opinion on who he feels is the favorite. Although he does say Morales was "a bit of an underdog".

The odds reflect the change post weigh in.

I just want to be clear that I am not trying to make Morales out to be 126 Morales. He was well past it when Danny beat him. My point is when comparing the resumes, Danny has fewer names but has 3 upsets that should get more credit.

[frantic fighter]

yeah his dad ducked before it could even be offered.

Speaking to Elie Seckbach of ES News, father to Danny Garcia, Angel Garcia said to get a Pacquiao fight over the line it would take:

“Manny needs to get to $4 million. We get whatever he’s getting.

You can't duck something that's not on the table regardless of what Angel said.

[vman075]

I give a slight edge to Tim but I think its closer than others. Tim has the names but Danny has 3 huge upsets that people shouldn't overlook.

Remember when Danny fought Morales the 1st time, Danny was the underdog. He was a huge underdog against Khan and Matts as well. Other than Manny, Tim wasn't the underdog in many of these fights.

Not quite. He was only the underdog twice (Khan and Lucas, not Morales*) and was a 2 to 1 underdog against Lucas (he was a bigger favorite against Morales than Lucas was against him), that's not a huge upset, that's some of the closest odds we see in boxing today. The Khan fight was a big upset, I remember Khan being around a 5 to 1 favorite.

*March 21, 2012 Sportsbook 5dimes.com has the current odds of a Garcia win at -325 and a Morales victory at +265. Visit 5Dimes.com to bet on this fight!

[PACnPBFsuck]

and before that he lost to judah. yeah zab judah.

Just as I suspected, boxrec warrior confirmed.