Who has the Better Resume? Bradley or Danny Garcia

[The Big Dunn]

i agree with all of this this.....i was just saying bradley's resume was criminally overrated. he's pretty overrated as a fighter skillwise too, his boxing iq very low.

I would disagree a bit. I think Bradley's resume is outstanding. He came up the hard way.

With Danny, posters (conveniently) forget that Morales was the favorite going in, as was Khan and Matts. Those were huge upsets that IMO Danny doesn't get enough credit for. He came up the hard way as well.

I think posters judge all of Danny's career on the Salka fight, which is BS.

[Xi_]

i like how you guys are using khan as a creditble name just to hype up gracia. khan gets laughed at on here daily LOL. lucas was damage good.

so bradley ducked khan to fight manny.

danny ducked manny to fight samuel vargas!

khan was credible at 140 when bradley was there. why not fight him then fight pacquiao after? bradley said he was afraid he'd lose the khan his words not mine. and explain how lucas was damage good when many around here were picking him to not only kill danny but also beat floyd?

[True-Boxing-Fan]

This is a fu cking no brainer. What would make someone say Garcia has a better serine than Bradley.

[bojangles1987]

I would disagree a bit. I think Bradley's resume is outstanding. He came up the hard way.

With Danny, posters (conveniently) forget that Morales was the favorite going in, as was Khan and Matts. Those were huge upsets that IMO Danny doesn't get enough credit for. He came up the hard way as well.

I think posters judge all of Danny's career on the Salka fight, which is BS.

Morales wasn't the favorite going into either fight. Looked this up before when someone said he was the underdog against Morales and Judah and everybody. Garcia was the betting favorite.

[PACnPBFsuck]

i like how you guys are using khan as a creditble name just to hype up gracia. khan gets laughed at on here daily LOL. lucas was damage good.

so bradley ducked khan to fight manny.

danny ducked manny to fight samuel vargas!

You still haven't explained this!!!!

[WesternChamp]

khan was credible at 140 when bradley was there. why not fight him then fight pacquiao after? bradley said he was afraid he'd lose the khan his words not mine. and explain how lucas was damage good when many around here were picking him to not only kill danny but also beat floyd?

why waste time of khan when you get offer a fight with manny?

why didnt danny fight manny instead of fighting smauel vargas?

[The Big Dunn]

Morales wasn't the favorite going into either fight. Looked this up before when someone said he was the underdog against Morales and Judah and everybody. Garcia was the betting favorite.

You sure? he definitely wasn't in the 2nd fight.

edit: did the odds change once Morales didn't make weight?

[WesternChamp]

You still haven't explained this!!!!

career was already winding down.

same when bradley fought rulsan.

[WesternChamp]

You sure? he definitely wasn't in the 2nd fight.

how could a 40 year old version of morales be the favorite going into the danny fight?

[Xi_]

I would disagree a bit. I think Bradley's resume is outstanding. He came up the hard way.

With Danny, posters (conveniently) forget that Morales was the favorite going in, as was Khan and Matts. Those were huge upsets that IMO Danny doesn't get enough credit for. He came up the hard way as well.

I think posters judge all of Danny's career on the Salka fight, which is BS.

he beat decent fighters but he's definitely not hof material like some people are claiming on nsb. people are giving him way too much credit for an older version of marquez at ww.....a younger marquez is deemed not credible at ww by many of these posters so how can an older verison be credible.