Originally posted by the_truth_1984
How ****** is espn for not producing an other ppv
Collapse
-
word brotha word thats how I feel about it and I know they can do it agian but the production will be even better hopefully the fights turn out as good on the second ppv -
you have a very good point there was a point in the last two years in some weight devisons that the reconized champs of those divisons did not have belts and that is how it should be now. What I eould like to see is the old days 8 weight classes one belt no wonder of who is the man although I actually kinda in a way like the who is the man contorversy now call me crazy. But they are not champs if you do not hold wins over the top guys you aint no champ and it can't be just one champ you need to prove that you are the man at the wight class you are fighting at. who ever you do not need to fight other people that have belt you just need to beat the best fighters avalable and beat them.Originally posted by IwatchBoxingQuite Frankly gives boxing some support atleast, still no ESPN highlights, but maybe thats because boxing has becoming so broad and fake, they dont even bother with it. I find it hard keeping up with the sport whens their 17 divsion and over 70 champions. Now their even giving 107 pounders spotlight, its getting too deep.Comment
-
ESPN is only interested in fighters from the past...they are probably trying to think of a way to put marciano vs dempsey on ppv....maybe throw their skeletons at each other to see which skeleton is tougher....we have to wait until the old guys at ESPN retire so until then it's rerun after rerun of greeat fighters from the 1920'sComment
Comment