Why do Golovtards use the Lemieux as some sort of benchmark?

[Kigali]

You're above perpetuating that myth...
When there was a poll a few months back, most here claimed Martin Murray as Golovkin's best opponent. It wasn't Golovkin that turned him into a bum, losing to everyone with a name did that.
David "I miraculously got good before fighting GGG" Lemieux's resume speaks for itself.
Wade?
Rubio?
ROSADO?
Need I go on?

It's an awful division. I wish people would just be honest and say that GGG's talent is not illustrated by his resume. It's far more respectable than propping up a bunch of trash and calling it yard art.

For the first time in boxing's long illustrious history......160 is weaker than Heavyweight.

A combined effort consisting of several demographics,each sorrier than the last,is trying in vain to claim 160 is not weak.

160 is so dead Cotto won a title there at a time he couldn't buy a strap at 147 and 154.

160 is so dead Jermain Taylor's shot to hell crazy ass recently won a title.

160 is so dead Domic Wade was a #1 contender.

160 is so dead Marco Antonio Rubio held the WBC MW title...that bum couldn't hold a spit bucket at 154....let alone a title.