If the WBA changes the split.......

[Larry the boss]

Why is it that GGG fanboys are such hypocrites??? You get mad at Canelo( as I did too) for wanting too give GGG a flat fee but GGG is trying too shaft Jacobs on the split and it's ok??? In the WBA rules he can contest the split, he's asking for 60/40 from what evidence has been provided GGG wants 75/25. 60/40 is a bit high but 75/25 is an insult.

Thank you..its ****ing ridiculous....these guys act like GGG and his dumbass team can do no wrong...damn make a concession and give us a good damn fight

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

Why is it that GGG fanboys are such hypocrites??? You get mad at Canelo( as I did too) for wanting too give GGG a flat fee but GGG is trying too shaft Jacobs on the split and it's ok??? In the WBA rules he can contest the split, he's asking for 60/40 from what evidence has been provided GGG wants 75/25. 60/40 is a bit high but 75/25 is an insult.

He's not trying to shaft anyone. Everyone here KNOWS Jacobs is not worth the 40%. Yes, we say give it to him cause we wanna see the fight get made but that clown can't even sell out in his own hometown.

[NEETzsche]

fixed it for you........

as a fan, i'd like GGG to be the bigger man in this situation

he's a bigger star than jacobs which means he's under more scrutiny than jacobs, and that's why he needs this fight more than jacobs does

if jacobs goes 12 months without a significant bout, few people actually care. not the case for golovkin. he got paid well for the brook mismatch, now let's see him make some concessions and give something back to us hardcores

[OnePunch]

Thank you..its ****ing ridiculous....these guys act like GGG and his dumbass team can do no wrong...damn make a concession and give us a good damn fight

in the canelo deal, they tried to make a deal. If no deal could be reached they were fine going to bid under the existing rules.

in the Jacobs deal, they tried to make a deal. If no deal can be reached they are fine going to bid under the existing rules

Im not sure where you see any inconsistencies in their philosophy.

[Gentblue]

how do you know that? jacobs already admitted to turning down 3 million. i mean what percentage of the total purse is that right there? got to be pretty close to 40 if not more. you can't tell this is just setting up the duck? oh we didn't get the purse split we wanted so we aren't fighting. if they do get it then i dont see why ggg wouldn't fight, problem is will 40 percent of whatever the purse split be enough for jacobs? if 3 million wasnt enough i dont know. has to be a hell of a purse split of close to 10 million dollars. sometimes there just isn't enough money to satisfy one party but instead of blaming that party we blame the other guy? hmmm k reasonable

Was the 3 mil flat fee?? Is the fight gonna be on PPV or regular HBO?? Remember bro Jacobs is dangerous. I favor GGG but Jacobs can crack and isn't dumb.. 10 million to be honest I believe this fight is worth that.... Wilder vs Pevetkin was over 7 and this is bigger then that.. it does better then GGG v Lemieux since GGG has the Aura of Canelos Boogeyman.

If 75-25 is what other fighters got after purse bid than why should Jacob's get more? Guys like Jacob are the worst, he feels he's special and should be treated as such when facts are he's an average fighter with power and a suspect chin.

It's a spit in the face of Golovkin because he's not respecting the rules. Champion gets 75% in case of a pursebid, end of story.

Now if they can come to terms with a higher purse that's fine but if it goes to bid the split should be the same for this fight as it's been for all other fights.

Anyone that disagrees is a simp and a mark.

Asking for a higher purse percentage is within the rules. You say average; ok they both have fought guys below them in skill. What does that make GGG??

[OnePunch]

Thank you..its ****ing ridiculous....these guys act like GGG and his dumbass team can do no wrong...damn make a concession and give us a good damn fight

why is it always on THEM to make the concessions? Why cant the rules as written just be applied?

If Canelo-GGG had gone to bid, it would have been 70-30 or whetever. All you guys say "ggg should accept less than 70-30 because canelo a-side doe" and blah blah blah

If GGG-Jacobs goes to bid, the mandated split would have been 75-25, yet all you guys say "GGG should pay Jacobs more because...... uhmmmm...... because LEGACY doe" and blah blah blah


Its always on GGG to give up money. Never on the other side.......


hmmmm, I wonder why........

[Larry the boss]

in the canelo deal, they tried to make a deal. If no deal could be reached they were fine going to bid under the existing rules.

in the Jacobs deal, they tried to make a deal. If no deal can be reached they are fine going to bid under the existing rules

Im not sure where you see any inconsistencies in their philosophy.

dude i dont ****ing care..just make the damn fights happen and give me a good damn match up...dude is not getting any younger and i dont wanna see anymore bum fights or ww's....time to deliver

[Larry the boss]

why is it always on THEM to make the concessions? Why cant the rules as written just be applied?

If Canelo-GGG had gone to bid, it would have been 70-30 or whetever. All you guys say "ggg should accept less than 70-30 because canelo a-side doe" and blah blah blah

If GGG-Jacobs goes to bid, the mandated split would have been 75-25, yet all you guys say "GGG should pay Jacobs more because...... uhmmmm...... because LEGACY doe" and blah blah blah


Its always on GGG to give up money. Never on the other side.......


hmmmm, I wonder why........

Because he is the one always fighting **** fights..if he wants a damn challenge he will have to bend a little.i mean damn all ya'll want to do is brag about who wont fight him while he fights the Wades and ww's of the world..timeout for that bull**** the act is old and stale

[NEETzsche]

why is it always on THEM to make the concessions? Why cant the rules as written just be applied?

If Canelo-GGG had gone to bid, it would have been 70-30 or whetever. All you guys say "ggg should accept less than 70-30 because canelo a-side doe" and blah blah blah

If GGG-Jacobs goes to bid, the mandated split would have been 75-25, yet all you guys say "GGG should pay Jacobs more because...... uhmmmm...... because LEGACY doe" and blah blah blah


Its always on GGG to give up money. Never on the other side.......


hmmmm, I wonder why........

because otherwise people won't face him. these are the options he's left with: make concessions or miss out on legacy fights

life isn't fair

[Gentblue]

why is it always on THEM to make the concessions? Why cant the rules as written just be applied?

If Canelo-GGG had gone to bid, it would have been 70-30 or whetever. All you guys say "ggg should accept less than 70-30 because canelo a-side doe" and blah blah blah

If GGG-Jacobs goes to bid, the mandated split would have been 75-25, yet all you guys say "GGG should pay Jacobs more because...... uhmmmm...... because LEGACY doe" and blah blah blah


Its always on GGG to give up money. Never on the other side.......


hmmmm, I wonder why........

70/30 is fair but the big difference is GGG in terms of status is closer too Jacobs then Canelo that's why some people say he's asking for too much but his fight with Nelo is easily a over 50 million dollar fight. So a flat fee is garbage.

Also it's called making Concessions too be great....Canelo did it with Floyd and Floyd did with Oscar..