Comments Thread For: Joseph Parker In Prime Position For Heavyweight Takeover

[Earl-Hickey]

Takam was top 5 in nearly every sanctioning body. and a solid top 10 heavyweight, i highly doubt you have even seen more than 1 of his fight's going by your responses.

Sparked out by Povetkin, so what? povetkin has the best resume in the divison and would imo knock both wilder and AJ the *** out. btw takam gave him hell up to the stoppage.

Parker has a better win than both wilder and aj, it's not my opinion, it's a fact.

I don't need to have a look, he scrambled his brain and made him do a silly dance, you can pretend all you like but he was one big shot away from being stopped.

Povetkin went life and death with huck ffs

And that was a few years ago when he was In his prime

[SN!PER]

Fatboy Andy lasts 4 rounds tops.

[bluepete]

There's no point talking sense to you, especially since you can't even seem to form a simple paragraph.

I didnt say anything that swayed from fact's, and that's the end of the conversation, takam is the best win out of parker, joshua and wilder. You can blabber on about claims to fame and tony mowbray all you want mate, that doesnt change.

Tbh i dont even know what point you're trying to make, AJ was not badly hurt when he clearly was, takam is crap because he lost a great fight to one of the best in the division.... but making that point means im comparing him to tyson...

yeah ok mate, how about take a deep breath, figure out what your actual point is, construct a paragraph and try to make it.

hope this help's

Your description of Parker is miles away from reality.He's got one name in his record,who's moment of glory was being stopped ,not by the monster you described that would crush Wilder and Aj ,but by a guy who went life and death with Huck and was toyed with by Klitschko.I didn't say Joshua wasn't hurt by the left hook by Whyte ,but one punch from being stopped? That's just laughable and your alone in thinking that.Nonsense in paragraphs is still nonsense.You act like people who think AJ would beat Parker are criticising a loved one.Is that what this is about?

[mlac]

Your description of Parker is miles away from reality.He's got one name in his record,who's moment of glory was being stopped ,not by the monster you described that would crush Wilder and Aj ,but by a guy who went life and death with Huck and was toyed with by Klitschko.I didn't say Joshua wasn't hurt by the left hook by Whyte ,but one punch from being stopped? That's just laughable and your alone in thinking that.Nonsense in paragraphs is still nonsense.You act like people who think AJ would beat Parker are criticising a loved one.Is that what this is about?

im gunna have to say this is my last response, you're chunks of texts are hurting my eyes.

you're attempts to discredit povetkin.... grasping at straw's much?

Firstly learn the definition of 'life and death' winning a close fight does equate to such a dramatic extreme, but that's all you seem to be doing, picking out my points and then blowing them out to an extreme, it's just dumb.

Povetkin is good = he's mike tyson, winning a close fight = life and death and so on...

'toyed with' again do you even watch the fight's you're talking about? either that or you must be brain damaged. wlad should of been disqualified in the povetkin fight, it was beyond ridiculous...200 clinches? GTFOH.

I never said takam would beat aj or wilder, not only can you not form a simple paragraph but you don't seem to be able to read?

You're sole point is takam's 'claim to fame' is losing to povetkin in a close slobber knocker, i have no idea why you keep using that term, like we're on a tmz forum or something.
If we're talking takam, his best win is brutalising tony thompson and beating perez (robbery)

Takam = solid top 10/ (now) 15 heavyweight....bbbbbbbbbut povetkin doe???

I don't care whether people think AJ will KO parker or not, why would i, ...in case you haven't noticed this is a boxing forum where such matters are debated.

I just feel sorry for all the easily brainwashed aj casual fan's that suck up the snakeoilsalesman lies that come out hearn's mouth every time he speak's.
Im trying to save these guy's dude, Just imagine how crushed they will be when their hero goes to sleep, and the hype job is exposed...im the good Samaritan here!

[bluepete]

im gunna have to say this is my last response, you're chunks of texts are hurting my eyes.

you're attempts to discredit povetkin.... grasping at straw's much?

Firstly learn the definition of 'life and death' winning a close fight does equate to such a dramatic extreme, but that's all you seem to be doing, picking out my points and then blowing them out to an extreme, it's just dumb.

Povetkin is good = he's mike tyson, winning a close fight = life and death and so on...

'toyed with' again do you even watch the fight's you're talking about? either that or you must be brain damaged. wlad should of been disqualified in the povetkin fight, it was beyond ridiculous...200 clinches? GTFOH.

I never said takam would beat aj or wilder, not only can you not form a simple paragraph but you don't seem to be able to read?

You're sole point is takam's 'claim to fame' is losing to povetkin in a close slobber knocker, i have no idea why you keep using that term, like we're on a tmz forum or something.
If we're talking takam, his best win is brutalising tony thompson and beating perez (robbery)

Takam = solid top 10/ (now) 15 heavyweight....bbbbbbbbbut povetkin doe???

I don't care whether people think AJ will KO parker or not, why would i, ...in case you haven't noticed this is a boxing forum where such matters are debated.

I just feel sorry for all the easily brainwashed aj casual fan's that suck up the snakeoilsalesman lies that come out hearn's mouth every time he speak's.
Im trying to save these guy's dude, Just imagine how crushed they will be when their hero goes to sleep, and the hype job is exposed...im the good Samaritan here!

Nowhere did I write that you said Takam would beat AJ or Wilder ,have another look at what I wrote.I said Takams claim to fame is a loss to the monster (Povetkin ) you describe who would plod through Aj and Wilder.So maybe you should learn to read.For someone who doesn't care you've certainly fought Parkers case,defending him from my fierce attack where I said I just don't see anything so impressive about him.Of course you have to do the oldest narcissist trick and start talking about people's writing spelling ect because you can't handle people having a different opinion than you.I hope my lack of paragraphs hasn't hurt your eyes so bad that your close to being stopped.You know ,like you reckon AJ was.

[bluepete]

im gunna have to say this is my last response, you're chunks of texts are hurting my eyes.

you're attempts to discredit povetkin.... grasping at straw's much?

Firstly learn the definition of 'life and death' winning a close fight does equate to such a dramatic extreme, but that's all you seem to be doing, picking out my points and then blowing them out to an extreme, it's just dumb.

Povetkin is good = he's mike tyson, winning a close fight = life and death and so on...

'toyed with' again do you even watch the fight's you're talking about? either that or you must be brain damaged. wlad should of been disqualified in the povetkin fight, it was beyond ridiculous...200 clinches? GTFOH.

I never said takam would beat aj or wilder, not only can you not form a simple paragraph but you don't seem to be able to read?

You're sole point is takam's 'claim to fame' is losing to povetkin in a close slobber knocker, i have no idea why you keep using that term, like we're on a tmz forum or something.
If we're talking takam, his best win is brutalising tony thompson and beating perez (robbery)

Takam = solid top 10/ (now) 15 heavyweight....bbbbbbbbbut povetkin doe???

I don't care whether people think AJ will KO parker or not, why would i, ...in case you haven't noticed this is a boxing forum where such matters are debated.

I just feel sorry for all the easily brainwashed aj casual fan's that suck up the snakeoilsalesman lies that come out hearn's mouth every time he speak's.
Im trying to save these guy's dude, Just imagine how crushed they will be when their hero goes to sleep, and the hype job is exposed...im the good Samaritan here!

Btw ,childish name calling of fighters as fat slobs,juicua ect calling people mental and then calling someone out for using a phrase like "claim to fame" is hypocritical projection.Part of your condition I suppose.

[Karoriori]

Parker will likely beat whoever is in front of him and the people discrediting the guy will come up with more farcical nonsense as to why he apparently sucks.

[mlac]

Nowhere did I write that you said Takam would beat AJ or Wilder ,have another look at what I wrote.I said Takams claim to fame is a loss to the monster (Povetkin ) you describe who would plod through Aj and Wilder.So maybe you should learn to read.For someone who doesn't care you've certainly fought Parkers case,defending him from my fierce attack where I said I just don't see anything so impressive about him.Of course you have to do the oldest narcissist trick and start talking about people's writing spelling ect because you can't handle people having a different opinion than you.I hope my lack of paragraphs hasn't hurt your eyes so bad that your close to being stopped.You know ,like you reckon AJ was.

I must of missed that part.
...sorry were you were talking about ' narcissists' ?
All i read was a bunch of moving goalposts on your part and blowing my point's to the extreme...basically the polar opposite of 'fierce'.

Im not being nasty bout your spelling dawg! just requested paragraphs, they really are easy dude, it's just full stops and then press space bar

[juggernaut666]

Nowhere did I write that you said Takam would beat AJ or Wilder ,have another look at what I wrote.I said Takams claim to fame is a loss to the monster (Povetkin ) you describe who would plod through Aj and Wilder.So maybe you should learn to read.For someone who doesn't care you've certainly fought Parkers case,defending him from my fierce attack where I said I just don't see anything so impressive about him.Of course you have to do the oldest narcissist trick and start talking about people's writing spelling ect because you can't handle people having a different opinion than you.I hope my lack of paragraphs hasn't hurt your eyes so bad that your close to being stopped.You know ,like you reckon AJ was.

Takam fights in ONE mode and thats sparring partner mode which why hes very basic and seems lethargic when he fought Parker because he is mainly used as one . At 6'1 with not much power and WELL past his best these imbeciles would have you believe hes a bigger threat than the giant and bigger power punchers Joshua has fought . In the imbeciles defense Povetkin has improved since the Huck fight , but Takam best win is 44 year old Thompson in a decade.

[mlac]

]Btw ,childish name calling of fighters as fat slobs,juicua[/B] ect calling people mental and then calling someone out for using a phrase like "claim to fame" is hypocritical projection.Part of your condition I suppose.

It's 'Juicehua' btw
Yeah it's called having a sense of humour, you should give it a go sometime.

I don't think you are in any kind of position to call someone childish btw, since you can't implement a paragraph, when pretty much every 8 year old can manage it.