Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Golovkin's Coach: Options Lacking at 168, No Reason To Move Up

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Originally posted by carloscruz10009 View Post
    Did people forget GGGs last fight was such a great fight the WBO title wasnt on the line cause they saw it as a mismatch... Isnt his goal to unify? By not having belts on the line in certain fights??
    Damn you're dumb. He's never held the wbo belt. The wba belt wasn't on the line vs Brook, but what does that have to do with unifying? He's still the wba champ

    Comment


    • #72
      Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
      Damn you're dumb. He's never held the wbo belt. The wba belt wasn't on the line vs Brook, but what does that have to do with unifying? He's still the wba champ
      Do u know what unifying means? And ur wrong again GGG has 3 belts... Pretty sad man.


      http://www.badlefthook.com/2016/9/5/...ot-on-the-line
      Last edited by carloscruz10009; 10-01-2016, 01:29 PM.

      Comment


      • #73
        Originally posted by hitking View Post
        Can I get one period or comma outta you? Just one please sir.
        I'll give you an exclamation mark!!!!

        Comment


        • #74
          Originally posted by carloscruz10009 View Post
          Dude is a clown
          At theend of the day, GGG's style is gonna make it very difficult for him to be successful against bigger guys. He's a solid technical fighter, especially offensively. But his defense is crap, and he's totally dependant on his power. His power might not be as tough for bigger guys to take. And his chin may not be able to hold up taking as many flush shots as he takes. At the end of day, he's a good fighter. But, he's extremely limited and overrated. And they have to be very careful in how they match him. Because he has that "monster" label. And he's far from that.

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
            Damn you're dumb. He's never held the wbo belt. The wba belt wasn't on the line vs Brook, but what does that have to do with unifying? He's still the wba champ
            Ill try to keep it simple since im so dum.. GGG main argument to not move up or down is because he wants to unify. But he is already fighting in fights that are not unifying those belts. So why not face the best guys in non unification fights. Slow and dum enough for u to comprehend?

            Comment


            • #76
              Originally posted by hitking View Post
              At theend of the day, GGG's style is gonna make it very difficult for him to be successful against bigger guys. He's a solid technical fighter, especially offensively. But his defense is crap, and he's totally dependant on his power. His power might not be as tough for bigger guys to take. And his chin may not be able to hold up taking as many flush shots as he takes. At the end of day, he's a good fighter. But, he's extremely limited and overrated. And they have to be very careful in how they match him. Because he has that "monster" label. And he's far from that.
              Roy Jones said it best.. Your not a monster till you beat a monster

              Comment


              • #77
                Originally posted by carloscruz10009 View Post
                Do u know what unifying means? And ur wrong again GGG has 3 belts... Pretty sad man.


                http://www.badlefthook.com/2016/9/5/...ot-on-the-line
                The wbo is the only one he doesn't have duh. You had a 1/4 chance of being wrong, cong**** on overcoming the odds. Sure I know what unifying means, for example Ggg unified 3.

                Comment


                • #78
                  Originally posted by hitking View Post
                  Why is it OK for GGG to fight guys in lower divisions. But his fans and team are scared ****less of him fight bigger guys?
                  Because a bigger guy kills all they hope and dreams of lil g knocking guys out in sparring and fantasy matchups of him beating Ward, kov etc etc..

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Originally posted by carloscruz10009 View Post
                    Do u know what unifying means? And ur wrong again GGG has 3 belts... Pretty sad man.


                    http://www.badlefthook.com/2016/9/5/...ot-on-the-line
                    Back in the day, holding the WBC, WBA, and IBF was considered undisputed. The WBO only gained relevance recently. And basically since the turn of the century, all the ABC belts have loss relevance. They've only recently regained steam. Mostly because GGG has been on this bull**** "unification quest." Roy Jones was heavily criticized for basically doing what GGG is doing. And Roy did it fighting as a light heavyweight, when he legitimately could have been fighting a division lower. GGG is doing it in a natural weight class.

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
                      The wbo is the only one he doesn't have duh. You had a 1/4 chance of being wrong, cong**** on overcoming the odds. Sure I know what unifying means, for example Ggg unified 3.
                      But he fought in a fight where a belt wasnt on the line.. Isnt that why hes staying at 160?

                      Fyi the name calling doesnt sthregthen ur argument... In case you thought it did. I like GGG i just think the division is a joke
                      Last edited by carloscruz10009; 10-01-2016, 01:39 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP