Comments Thread For: Mayweather: If McGregor Stole My Blueprint, It's a Good Thing!

[gmc_rfc_06]

Floyd is smart enough to surround himself with a good team and amass a fortune.

He's better than any fighter that has ever or will ever come from Scotland.

Of course he is.

[IMG]https://media3.*****.com/media/NxEsKrLJXPuwg/200w.gif[/IMG]

Doesn't change the fact that his trash-talk 'blueprint' was a very transparent act.

[Fetta]

Floyd is smart enough to surround himself with a good team and amass a fortune.

He's better than any fighter that has ever or will ever come from Scotland.

Thought he was Irish

[Johnwoo8686]

It's not ironic. Stop using the word wrong.

You need to learn the definition of the word Ironic then come back and talk to me. He criticizes Mayweather for fighting Latin fighters and praises McGregor when the majority of McGregors opponents in the UFC have also been Latino.
That's irony.

[NateHound]

You need to learn the definition of the word Ironic then come back and talk to me. He criticizes Mayweather for fighting Latin fighters and praises McGregor when the majority of McGregors opponents in the UFC have also been Latino.
That's irony.

He criticized him for fighting mexican/popular fighters. Last I checked in the UFC McGregor has faced 1 Mexican/American (Diaz), 1 Mudblood (Mendes), 1 Hawaiian (Holloway), 2 Americans (Poirer, Brimage), 1 German (Siver), 2 Brazilians ( Aldo, Brandao)

3/8 of his fights have been against latinos. NONE of which hugely popular so even your wrong point would have been wrong. He has faced ONE Mexican who is BARELY even Mexican so that point is wrong. And even if you were right, it would not have been IRONY, it would have been a mistake. I swear none of you learnt that word at school.

[Johnwoo8686]

He criticized him for fighting mexican/popular fighters. Last I checked in the UFC McGregor has faced 1 Mexican/American (Diaz), 1 Mudblood (Mendes), 1 Hawaiian (Holloway), 2 Americans (Poirer, Brimage), 1 German (Siver), 2 Brazilians ( Aldo, Brandao)

3/8 of his fights have been against latinos. NONE of which hugely popular so even your wrong point would have been wrong. He has faced ONE Mexican who is BARELY even Mexican so that point is wrong. And even if you were right, it would not have been IRONY, it would have been a mistake. I swear none of you learnt that word at school.

Out of Floyd's last 6 fights only TWO were Mexican. One was a Mexican American in Guerrero who isn't even that popular. So how can you criticize Floyd for fighting popular Mexican fighters when the majority of his last few opponents weren't even Mexican?

And Conor has faced several latinos and is about to face one again in Novemeber. He hasn't fought a non Latin American in nearly two years. And Aldo and Diaz are pretty popular in the UFC, especially Aldo. Aldo and Diaz were also McGregor's two biggest paydays so don't tell me Conor can fight just anyone and it will sell.

It is ironic for him to criticize Floyd for fighting mostly Mexican fighters (which isn't exactly true) then praise McGregor for fighting mostly latin/Mexican fighters in the same statement.

And FYI this is the definition of irony:the expression of one's meaning by using language that normally signifies the opposite,

Go and read a book dummy