I know it is, dummy. I was born and raised here in the USA.
And it is amateur, it's exactly what it is, there is no better analogy. Amateur isn't a slight, I am an amateur boxer and I would literally laugh in your face if you said I wasn't a real boxer because i'm not pro.
Doesn't mean I can't think it's ridiculous, for all the reasons I already stated above.
No one said it isn't a big deal here, my point is that I think it's ****** to take it seriously once you move on from college. I only watch pro sports.
It went entirely over your head. The only people criticizing replay numbers are people that are embittered against a fighter. It's not like a Euro replay where it's the first chance most get to see it. And, I don't even hold Euro replay numbers against a fighter.
This thread looks like a bunch of simpletons screaming, "Ha ha, he supposed to be A side doe!"
I'd never criticize Golovkin, Kovalev, Canelo, Fury or anyone over a fkn replay number. That's desperate haterism.
don't ever disrespect replayism! now let's see shall we...
Golovkin vs Brook "replay" vs live, hours later on fight day, gets "800k..."
Alvarez vs Brook Sept. 23rd replay gets ...."400K+"
a half rate replay a week later vs the Brook bout #s is bad?
in other news, i dont see how this college football crap gets so many viewers smh....
And it's early in the season so most games are mismatches. Boxing fans complain about mismatches. College football fans love mismatches. I don't start watching until around the middle of conference play
Who wants to see dudes turning the ball over 8 times a game and finishing with a score of 61-3 . Rather watch pros
... I'm just proving a point that college pigskin is still and always will be healthy in AMerican culture. it's always been like that... why do soccer moms encourage soccer? i dont care... just talking about the reality of ratings and why it is so.
Tweet
Comment