Comments Thread For: Gonzalez: Canelo is NOT The Best - Until He Beats Golovkin!

[R-C]

You want to be the best in the world?
You got to beat the best in the world enough said, Golovkin is the best no Kovalev, not Ward, not anyone else.

How is GGG considered the BEST? I'm confused

[Verus]

In a perfect world, everything should be settled in the ring... and all the blabbering ahead of time would be kept to a bare minimum. But we have the explosion of social media to contend with now, with all it's shortcomings and circus acts daily. It would be an interesting research project... to see if we as a nation have become more productive or less productive with the advent of all the social media we can tap into. My guess would be less productive, since many people tie up a lot of their time with it now.

Less productive and unfortunately just as ******. People behave as if ignorance is a virtue and proudly display it.

[TOBYLEE1]

Canelo is delusional saying that he is the best. I good win against Cotto, the Khan circus fight and a made to order Smith. This is laughable to be claiming you are the best of the world with that level of competition.

Making so much money fighting this level of competition has gone to Canelo's head

[bluepete]

what makes GGG the best? canelo has beaten better opposion then GGG has fought.

Nobody Canelo has beaten is as good as Golovkin,who is considered the best middle due to the way he mangles his opposition.There's no one more obvious to fight at middle,he's unlikely to take on anyone like Andrade or the Charlos at light middle.

[Loque-san]

Canelo is delusional saying that he is the best. I good win against Cotto, the Khan circus fight and a made to order Smith. This is laughable to be claiming you are the best of the world with that level of competition.

Making so much money fighting this level of competition has gone to Canelo's head

What about Lara and Trout? Canelo is not the best fighter in the world but his resume is solid and certainly better than Golovkin's.

[M Bison]

what makes GGG the best? canelo has beaten better opposion then GGG has fought.

By beaten you mean robbed?
Look at GGG record there is no question marks at all, all definitive endings no dodgy draws, no dodgy split decisions, no judging favours like Canelo and Floyd both have had the Kazak god has done it the hard way the fair way that is what makes him the best.

[Bushbaby]

[bambam182]

Nobody Canelo has beaten is as good as Golovkin,who is considered the best middle due to the way he mangles his opposition.There's no one more obvious to fight at middle,he's unlikely to take on anyone like Andrade or the Charlos at light middle.

ok, so back to my question. who has GGG beaten that makes him the best? canelo beat lara and trout when all you fa9s on here were saying he was duckinbg ducking ducking ducking them? remember? or did everyone forget that since the ginger proved you guys wrong?

[bambam182]

By beaten you mean robbed?
Look at GGG record there is no question marks at all, all definitive endings no dodgy draws, no dodgy split decisions, no judging favours like Canelo and Floyd both have had the Kazak god has done it the hard way the fair way that is what makes him the best.

if canelo fought the same guys GGG has, he would also be unbeaten and his KO would be higher.

ok, so back to my question. who has GGG beaten that makes him the best? canelo beat lara and trout when all you fa9s on here were saying he was ducking ducking ducking ducking them? remember? or did everyone forget that since the ginger proved you guys wrong?

canelo has at least fought A level fighters, may, cotto, lara according to some of you. name 1 A level fighter GGG has fought? you cant therefore he isnt the best. WIlder has a better resume then GGG.

[TOBYLEE1]

What about Lara and Trout? Canelo is not the best fighter in the world but his resume is solid and certainly better than Golovkin's.

He does have those two names in his record but a lot of ppl think he lost to one or both fighters.