Should they strip Fury of his titles and let Wlad and Anthony Joshua fight for belts?

[Hov]

That would be a blockbuster. What do you guys think?

[Motorcity Cobra]

No. Guys who've earned their shot should be given their shot.

[Weltschmerz]

They need to strip Fury obviously but they need to sort out with the alphabet's how to fight for the titles.

[Weebler I]

WBA = Klitchko v Ortiz
WBO = Parker v Klitschko

One of those two fights needs to happen. If Klitschko chooses to fight Joshua for the IBF instead, then it's Ortiz v Ustinov and Parker v Ruiz.

Yes to stripping Fury, he won the titles fair and square but if you don't defend them then you don't get to sit on them.

[Hov]

No. Guys who've earned their shot should be given their shot.

who would be one of those guys?

[Weebler I]

who would be one of those guys?

The sanctioning body rankings are here: http://www.*********.com/rankings-2

f i g h t n e w s

[Hov]

WBA = Klitchko v Ortiz
WBO = Parker v Klitschko

One of those two fights needs to happen. If Klitschko chooses to fight Joshua for the IBF instead, then it's Ortiz v Ustinov and Parker v Ruiz.

Yes to stripping Fury, he won the titles fair and square but if you don't defend them then you don't get to sit on them.

Joshua won't fight him unless there is something to gain. Fighting Klitschko as a voluntary is all risk no reward so it won't happen.

[stellen]

Yes. For the sake of boxing's future AJ needs to be given the chance to finally destroy vladi and pack him off to the old folks home.

[Beercules]

What a mess.


I can see both sides of the argument to strip/not strip him

[Motorcity Cobra]

who would be one of those guys?

According to the sanctioning body rankings.