Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Hearn Says Parker is Frontrunner For Anthony Joshua, Nov. 26

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    I was hoping this match could marinate a little longer and we could get Parker/Price on the undercard of this event, even if it meant Joshua fighting Molina or Duhaupas. I'm high on Parker, but REALLY high on Joshua. I'll wait til the Dimitrenko fight before making a prediction on this one.

    Comment


    • #32
      Really liked the sound of the card they were trying to build, Joshua v Pullev, Parker v Price and Del Boy v Whyte. But if they can't do it, then I am happy to see Joshua v Parker in November. It just might be a bit harder to sell as not many casuals will know much about Parker

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by KillaCamNZ View Post
        For someone who's been around boxing for more than 5 minutes, you're an idiot.

        Parker got the mando by beating someone above anyone Joshua has beaten. If Parker isn't proven to be at least solid, you must think Joshua is a bum killer.

        Secondly, fight the top challengers? Joshua is the IBF holder. Parker is the #1 IBF challenger. Therefore, Parker is the top challenger for that belt. That doesn't need much more explanation. Or does it?
        Haye or ortiz would be far more deserving, I hate haye as much as everyone but Joshua goes quiet when his name is mentioned

        Comment


        • #34
          This is good news.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by mlac View Post
            useless? he has a better win than either joshua or wilder.

            Parker would easily beat both stirverne and pulev. stirverne is shot and a c level plodder, pulev has a jab and nothing else.

            ydsab.
            Takam is very limited and he gave Parker problems. Think you and the other guy are getting carried away with an undefeated record, have doubts you two have even watched him fight, cause It's not some crazy opinion for me to say he's not very good

            Comment


            • #36
              Takam is a good contender, he has decent skill and is strong, he just lacked a bit of power to finish Parker when he buzzed him, and vice versa, Parker lacked that bigtime power, but he passed a gutcheck and chincheck and needs to improve his boxing ability and strength, he may have done so for Dimitrenko, looks sharp in training clips

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by KillaCamNZ View Post
                For someone who's been around boxing for more than 5 minutes, you're an idiot.

                Parker got the mando by beating someone above anyone Joshua has beaten. If Parker isn't proven to be at least solid, you must think Joshua is a bum killer.

                Secondly, fight the top challengers? Joshua is the IBF holder. Parker is the #1 IBF challenger. Therefore, Parker is the top challenger for that belt. That doesn't need much more explanation. Or does it?
                Carlos Takam is a middle aged Frenchman and parker robbed him

                Comment


                • #38
                  That's great, better to fight Parker now IMO.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    If Anthony weren't holding a world title, I'd love to see him fight Parker. I just feel like our standards are so fking low. When I think "Heavyweight Champion of the World", I don't think of a guy who has never had a live opponent and is about to face Parker.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Redd Foxx View Post
                      If Anthony weren't holding a world title, I'd love to see him fight Parker. I just feel like our standards are so fking low. When I think "Heavyweight Champion of the World", I don't think of a guy who has never had a live opponent and is about to face Parker.
                      I'm excited for this one, I'll be happy with Stiverne, Pulev or Parker preferably I believe Parker is the stiffer test so I'd be happier with that one. These two are model pros of how to live your life and train.

                      Wilder is a true professional also and deserves props, winner to face Wilder or Klitschko would be something else.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP