Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What If Floyd Fought GGG...

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Chuckguy View Post
    No just no
    Heart g 9 f 8
    Power g 9 f 4
    Footwork g 6 f 10
    Handspeed g 6 f 9
    Ring IQ g 7 f 10
    No, you don't go life and death with guys like Maidana if your foot work and ring IQ are higher than that of Golovkin.

    His hand speed is greatly exaggerated like most things we rate the American so highly because we're told to believe he is this and that, Floyd ducked many chances to prove how good he really was something the likes of Pacquiao never did it's a shame really that some people aren't willing to judge Floyd fairly.

    Business sense: GGG 7/10, Floyd 10/10
    Ducking the best: GGG 0/10, Floyd 10/10

    You know you're overrated when you need to manipulate gloves and wait several years to make a fight happen these aren't things to be impressed about they should only be took into applause IF you like his business sense of making more cash because he certainly never once aimed to test himself anyone who says otherwise is likely a blind fanboy.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by tRYSIS3 View Post
      I honestly dont see how floyd can win this fight, GGG would throw defence out the window and would just walk through him like he did brook, only difference is that mayweather has even less power than brook.
      Floyd struggled in first fight with Maidana. Ggg ruins Maidana in 3

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Red Cyclone View Post
        No, you don't go life and death with guys like Maidana if your foot work and ring IQ are higher than that of Golovkin.

        His hand speed is greatly exaggerated like most things we rate the American so highly because we're told to believe he is this and that, Floyd ducked many chances to prove how good he really was something the likes of Pacquiao never did it's a shame really that some people aren't willing to judge Floyd fairly.

        Business sense: GGG 7/10, Floyd 10/10
        Ducking the best: GGG 0/10, Floyd 10/10

        You know you're overrated when you need to manipulate gloves and wait several years to make a fight happen these aren't things to be impressed about they should only be took into applause IF you like his business sense of making more cash because he certainly never once aimed to test himself anyone who says otherwise is likely a blind fanboy.
        You're comparing a 38 year old Floyd past prime to a prime GGG. But I guess when Floyd was dominating at 130-147 that doesn't count

        Comment


        • #64
          I'm just proposing a hypothetical question, mates. Personally, I think Golovkin would more likely than not be Floyd's conqueror, and would be the one to finally bring realization to both Floyd as well as his ******ed fanboys that as great as Mayweather is, he isn't invincible.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Chuckguy View Post
            You're comparing a 38 year old Floyd past prime to a prime GGG. But I guess when Floyd was dominating at 130-147 that doesn't count
            When you're ducking a guy for 6 years and only ever really force-ably moving up weight to fight guys that are tailor made for you it's a bit obvious where the criticism comes from I bet you're the first one to jump in and say Calzaghe and Marciano were overrated as fxck but you'd be first in line to defend a very sketchy record with Floyd... I mean why in fxcks name do you need to change Maidanas gloves, really?
            Is a C- fighter really that good enough to expose Floyd?

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by KLockard23 View Post
              I'm just proposing a hypothetical question, mates. Personally, I think Golovkin would more likely than not be Floyd's conqueror, and would be the one to finally bring realization to both Floyd as well as his ******ed fanboys that as great as Mayweather is, he isn't invincible.
              GGG isn't Maidana and Floyd went life and death with Maidana a drained version of GGG would maul Floyd and he'd do it with a greater ring IQ and better footwork.

              Comment


              • #67
                Well. First WE DON'T KNOW AN OUTCOME. Big time hyped match. Would boost Floyd the big big. Would be a decision obviously (note: this already been pointed out to you ^ ^)
                The points here to examine would be aa) What sort of purse? Golovkin only offered 10 million SO FAR vs Canelo. Vs Floyd, him at 30 million would be a low mark. If I WAS his team I'd force it 40,m minimum. That could effect things LOTS. Floyd purse? HAAAAA! At least what he made V. Manny. And....they be dreaming 200 million believe you me!
                Floyd could WIN COULD LOSE. A specific here is: What if Floyd were KO'd. Anyone can be KO,d -&- ggg hits SOOO HARD that you have multiple tapes out there persons accusing him of having loaded gloves (it's as bad a rumor as Willard's dramatic loss V Dempsey the years ago) [*I doubt it! Plus: you KNOW Officials will get more and more tighter there. Boxer would be labeled a lout and a criminal AND BE ARRESTED if it were the truth!]
                So...further idea here is WHAT-IF Floyd were KO'd? How would that effect his psyche?
                Brook - Floyd some would see as "pick-em" but Floyd vs GGG he would better steep.
                Such a promo would be absolute block buster world wide. "Wow", imagine.
                Floyd SHOULD NOT go into it allowing "IBO" be associated. VERY NON TRADITIONAL (I --HATE-- IBO anyone who push them it's because they are *****green/simple)
                John Wilkinson
                UWBCAFO-I

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Red Cyclone View Post
                  When you're ducking a guy for 6 years and only ever really force-ably moving up weight to fight guys that are tailor made for you it's a bit obvious where the criticism comes from I bet you're the first one to jump in and say Calzaghe and Marciano were overrated as fxck but you'd be first in line to defend a very sketchy record with Floyd... I mean why in fxcks name do you need to change Maidanas gloves, really?
                  Is a C- fighter really that good enough to expose Floyd?
                  You have valid points but I'm basing it on his skill set alone not resume and other things

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by All in View Post
                    Floyd struggled in first fight with Maidana. Ggg ruins Maidana in 3
                    I actually thought Floyd was better in the first fight.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by Red Cyclone View Post
                      When you're ducking a guy for 6 years and only ever really force-ably moving up weight to fight guys that are tailor made for you it's a bit obvious where the criticism comes from I bet you're the first one to jump in and say Calzaghe and Marciano were overrated as fxck but you'd be first in line to defend a very sketchy record with Floyd... I mean why in fxcks name do you need to change Maidanas gloves, really?
                      Is a C- fighter really that good enough to expose Floyd?
                      along that same token, if the type of gloves someone wears don't and shouldn't matter, why does someone need a specific pair?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP