Trinidad vs Brook @ 160 / Who ya gotz?

**Sugar Adam Ali** · 09-20-2016, 11:52 PM

Trinidad was a beast... Brook would get beaten down just like Reid, vargas, joppy

**Don Pichardo** · 09-20-2016, 11:53 PM

This is a rediculous question.

**Redd Foxx** · 09-20-2016, 11:54 PM

Even thought it wasn't Tito's best, he was a beast in a dangerous era and I can't see Brook surviving that without going horizontal at some point. Bad stylistic match-up for Brook.

**BEEHOP** · 09-21-2016, 12:39 AM

Trinidad, the result is the same at 147-160. Trinidad by late TKO

**boliodogs** · 09-21-2016, 12:59 AM

Brook is a good fighter. Trinidad is a great fighter.He was a world champion from age 20 to age 30 and won his first 40 fights before losing to Hopkins. He was welterweight champ for a record 6.5 years and 15 successful title defenses and when he could no longer make 147 he won the 154 pound title and defended that a few times. He was one of the best KO artists in welterweight history and he would knock Brook out.

**RINGG** · 09-21-2016, 01:19 AM

I think Tito would connect better than Golovkin did.

**PrBoxing88** · 09-21-2016, 06:38 AM

Tito by KO rd 4 to 6.

**PivotandRoll** · 09-21-2016, 06:57 AM

Tito always got dropped early and his boxing skills were pretty terrible at the top level with Vargas and De La Hoya making him look amateurish for long stretches.

That being said Tito is one of the fighters that made me love boxing....He was dangerous from the first minute to the last and one connected punch could change the fight.

I honestly think it's a KO for either within the first 3rds with Brook having a punchers chance to get a stoppage(maybe not an actual KO) with Tito being the favourite.

Strange how people thinks it's such an easy fight.... By the answers here it seems GGG vs Tito would be the better question,....

**Dean_Razorback** · 09-21-2016, 07:06 AM

who are the 7 people that voted for brook

Trinidad vs Brook @ 160 / Who ya gotz?