From what I read, the offer is just flat fee and no PPV upside. Which is a **** deal. You have to include some PPV upside because Golovkin will contribute to bringing in those numbers too. I'm not saying give him 50/50, or 60/40, but he needs to take a piece of that PPV upside.
Why isn't double what Canelo got vs Cotto a fair amount for GGG.
Collapse
-
Where you active in this forum when may offered pac a flat fee?
Did you see the revenue that may/pac generated?
Its the biggest fight in the sport. You dont negotiate those fights with flat fees. This is just another stalling antic.
To be honest i think cotto was unreasonable in his negotiations with canelo. Canelo was just as much of a draw as Cotto. But canelo needed to beat a name, and things in boxing didnt look very good after may/pac. He also wanted the lineal 160 belt.
The only other credible opponent, that was also a draw, was golovkin and canelo wasnt going to take that route. Cotto was a bigger draw, and easier to beat. Even today canelo doesnt want ggg and it's his most lucrative match.Comment
-
De la HoYa said the offer is 10million plus upsideWhere you active in this forum when may offered pac a flat fee?
Did you see the revenue that may/pac generated?
Its the biggest fight in the sport. You dont negotiate those fights with flat fees. This is just another stalling antic.
To be honest i think cotto was unreasonable in his negotiations with canelo. Canelo was just as much of a draw as Cotto. But canelo needed to beat a name, and things in boxing didnt look very good after may/pac. He also wanted the lineal 160 belt.
The only other credible opponent, that was also a draw, was golovkin and canelo wasnt going to take that route. Cotto was a bigger draw, to beat. Even today canelo doesnt want ggg and it's his most lucrative match.
GGG needs to learn to BsideComment
Comment