Let me make my little rant

[-Kev-]

He is the Sven Ottke of taking criticism

He can punch (is fans can criticize), but if you dare punch him, the ref (his fans) will stop the fight to tell you he can not be punched

[just the facts]

For those questioning my nationality, nationality is not the same as race. I can be whatever but at the end of the day my race is WHITE. I am white skinned, and I am proud. PERIOD. Golovkin is from Kazakhstan but he is just as white as a white person from any other nationality.

One month you're Cuban, one month you're Mexican, the next month you're Puerto Rican, etc. The only things we can confirm is that you are a liar and an idiot.

[GGG Gloveking]

The racism and the insults go both ways. For every one poster calling 'GGG haters' a certain demographic, there's another calling GGG fans racists. For every one saying guys are ****** posters, there's another saying pussie g and his pussie fans. I've been called all sorts of names and insults for nothing more than my screen name. There was a thread the other day, and 3 of the first four comments were derogatory towards Golovkin fans, not GGG himself. I dont want to come here and be called racist, pussie, ignorant, and so forth by some FN keyboard warrior. I come to talk boxing, and only respond when Im attacked first.

Some of you guys want to talk about Larry. I would rather talk boxing with Larry than a large percentage of 'GGG haters'. Larry has never once called me anything derogatory. He gives credit where credit is due. There was a thread not limg ago asking for your top5 active fighters. Larry had Golovkin on his list. Look at his 'fight weekend' analysis vid. He respecrfully gives his perspective on the Golovkin-Brook fight, without just bashing GGG for 'fighting a welterweight'. Like I said, Id rather talk boxing with Larry, than a lot of these other dudes

[Doctor_Tenma]

Why is it wrong time to defend him?

He got crapped on when the Brook fight was announced. Not many people defended him then. This weekend he went out and put on a show. Virtually everyone agreed it was one of the most entertaining fights they've seen in years.

Defending his performance, why not? If you were on this forum and never saw the fight, you would somehow think that he lost the fight badly - not TKO his opponent by 5th round and land more punches in every single round.

He talked about a street fight before the night, and that's exactly what he delivered. It's not like he forgot how to box within last year. People complained when he systematically destroyed Lemieux, now they're complaining that he won a street fight.

Well because the fight was an actual circus, it's one no one wanted to see and Golovkin did not look particularly good which he admitted himself. As for the Lemieux fight, I don't remember people complaining about his approach but more that the fight itself wasn't the war they expected, Lemieux isn't that good so it didn't surprise me.

[The Hammer]

He is the Sven Ottke of taking criticism

He can punch (is fans can criticize), but if you dare punch him, the ref (his fans) will stop the fight to tell you he can not be punched

Who are you talking about, Floyd or Ward?

GGG has never had the benefit of a crooked home referee.

[-Kev-]

Who are you talking about, Floyd or Ward?

GGG has never had the benefit of a crooked home referee.

GGG on boxingscene is the Sven Ottke of taking criticism. It's not hard to understand what I said, Freedom

[-MEGA-]

At the current moment you're white-knighting for Larry and his bizarre friends, doesn't mean you always white-knight for Larry and his bizarre friends. What I'm trying to say is you can white knight now and call him out on his **** later, the two aren't exclusive. Maybe you've change your stance since the last page I read in this thread however.

But for the most part what Freedom said is true, Larry is full of ****. He's also possibly ******ed, but the jury is still out on that one.

But the moment you pulled that I'm white so disproves your theory kind of killed your argument. #NotAll but most are and the whole argument over Golovkin's resume is overblown bigoted bull****.

They're like we gotta get revenge for all those years posters discredit Mayweather, what a bunch of sniveling crybabies.

I didnt even take up for Larry, he can handle himself. I simply questioned Freedoms use of the word "demographic".

[Zaryu]

I think all fighters have fans who get easily butt hurt. Especially when a lot of these fans are new to the sport and the craziness of anonymity online. I personally am not a fan of people trashing boxers in general. One thing is to make fun of boxers, like Canelo for acting tough in the ring for GGG but then vacating his belt and fighting someone even less accomplished, but even then it's just busting balls I'm still a big fan of Canelo.

What I don't really enjoy is reading long winded posts trying to discredit a certain fighter while trying to justify the accomplishments of even lesser fighters. I also don't like it when keyboard warriors call fighters quitters or cowards. Either way, comments on message boards don't mean much to me, I just browse to see people's reactions to what's going on and every once in a while I find some really good quality posts from some folks here.

[Chuckguy]

I have a question, why do people get mad when GGG gets hate?? why do posters act like he is not allowed to be hated on? I have been on this forum for almost 10 years and have seen fighters who have accomplished more be torn apart. So why the surprise when GGG gets slammed?

The same posters who get mad at people for slamming GGG sit on here and slam other fighters left and right. So what is the real issue at hand here? Honestly i just want to see the man in better fights, but i troll certain posters because they praise him like he has an alt resume or accomplishments when he doesnt. But fighters who do have great resumes and accomplishments get slammed and their accomplishments ripped apart.

They get bothered because it comes from homers like you , teddy P, puge, and a bunch of other mayweather butt huggers. He deserves to be criticized not for not moving up or the Lara fight but for fighting w fawking WW!
The thing is when you defend floyds every move its kinda hard to take you serious even though you might be right in criticizing GGG. Then you have Cotto and Canelo fan boys criticizing GGG when both blatantly ducked him when they held the lineal belt in GGG weight class.
Larry the fact that you but more specifically others are perfectly fine with the lineal champ ducking the fighter that is rated #1 in that division is what's hurting the sport.
Every fighter needs that big name (popular by the casuals not necessarily the best) to give him a shot to cross over. Floyd and PAC had Oscar and without them they aren't sh it as far as PPV stars. Cotto became that star after PAC fight. See the pattern?? Floyd refused to give GGG that shot and I'm fine with it, 160 is asking way too much of Floyd. But he did give Canelo that shot and that's why Canelo is the man now. He could hav done the same for GGG but he knows he would get wrecked! Now he is waiting for him to get old and I guarantee that Can'tNelo fights GGG late 2017 or early 2018. Can'tNelo is following the mayweather plan to a t! Biggest fight least risk. He should get more hate then he does don't you think?

[Godsfly]

forget all of this....i need to hear what happens with larry and freedom in vegas.

freedom is a coward so he's probably just chatting **** about meeting larry. the guy won't even show his face or appear on the radio for debates let alone meet posters.