>>> Golovkin is going to drop his WBA trinket...
Collapse
-
Hey he is probably from Grand Rapids, Las Vegas, or Cincinnati. He is a nutt swinger from Floydie to Broner. Has to be a fan of both. He probably follows Floydie's around trying to catch a glimpse of his hero. Knowing your hero doesn't give a ratt's *** about any of you all. Same with your other hero Broner. Dude learn some boxing before you go calling out other races for fighting easy fights . Your hero was the king of cherry picking and having every advantage.Comment
-
The rest of that dumb sh it you're talking is speculative and subjective. The fact remains that both Jacobs and Lemieux lost earlier in their careers and both learned and improved from their losses. I don't see where it matterd but so much that one guy lost to a slightly better fighter in their learning process. That's triangle theory sh it there. I bet Jacobs v Lemieux would be an exciting fight. Both have come a long way since being beaten. However, you wamt to excuse one, while bashing the other.
I dont have any more time to play with you now, I have some running to doComment
-
I say thee Nay!!!...Bank on it.
Brook has shown the world the blueprint on how to beat Golovkin and Jacobs is just as skilled as Brook. Only difference is Jacobs is a big 160lb'er with power in BOTH hands. Even HBO is on record saying that they want no parts of a Golovkin Jacobs fight. Do the math, Golovkin is gonna swerve Jacobs...
If anything, Jacobs will ***** out because 25% of the purse isn't enough to take a beating.Comment
-
If anyone's vacating, it's Jacobs... unless HBO really are idiots and want to damage their own product...GGG has the safety net of the purse bid...Al would have to pay him 5 million to (barely)be able to pay Jacobs more than the 1.5 million he said was too little....i mean, if Jacobs want at least 3 mill, Al would have to bid 12 million....insane
the only thing holding GGG back from that would be HBO throwing a hissy fit and not only damaging people's perception of their own product, but cutting him off from making a lot of money, which shouldn't be taken lightly by him or his team.
Comment
-
in theory thats true, but Al could just as easily bid say $5 million, and if he wins he pays jacobs 1.25 from the bid and then another 1.75 on the side if he really wants to make the fight.If anyone's vacating, it's Jacobs... unless HBO really are idiots and want to damage their own product...GGG has the safety net of the purse bid...Al would have to pay him 5 million to (barely)be able to pay Jacobs more than the 1.5 million he said was too little....i mean, if Jacobs want at least 3 mill, Al would have to bid 12 million....insane
the only thing holding GGG back from that would be HBO throwing a hissy fit and not only damaging people's perception of their own product, but cutting him off from making a lot of money, which shouldn't be taken lightly by him or his team.
The upside for Haymon in that scenario is that the extra 1.75 is PBC money (someone elses), but the management percentage he takes from Jacobs goes straight to Haymon Boxing....Comment
Comment