Billy Joe Saunders to fight GGG?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • animelive
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Dec 2015
    • 919
    • 26
    • 13
    • 8,359

    #31
    Originally posted by Derranged
    I'd rather him fight Jacobs because people will screaming "duck" if Golovkin chooses Saunders, even though Golovkin had previously tried getting fights with both fighters who are both top guys in the division.

    But I don't think Saunders is too crazy about a Golovkin fight at all, despite his tweets after the fight on Saturday.
    It is better if he fights BJS tbh. If he gets all belts, he can sell Jacobs fight and it does need a bit of selling because Jacobs is a no name demanding 3-4 million dollars. Another flop ppv isn't a good idea right now.

    Comment

    • Jewish-Reptile
      COLD HEARTBREAKER
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Nov 2013
      • 10708
      • 922
      • 1,095
      • 15,382

      #32
      Last I saw of BJ Flounders he was video taping men getting naked. Can this be serious ?

      Comment

      • hugh grant
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2006
        • 30538
        • 2,200
        • 924
        • 105,596

        #33
        Again I feel bjs wontt fight eubsnk so eubank needs an opponent ie Jacobs. Bjs can fight ggg

        Comment

        • Eastcoast
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Aug 2014
          • 8639
          • 288
          • 0
          • 15,501

          #34
          Loeffler & Warren are meeting today to discuss GGG/BJS.





          Yesterday Loeffler contacted Tom Brown (a Haymon promoter) on behalf of Jacobs.

          Considering Jacobs/Golovkin needs to be ppv, and considering Danny Jacobs only drew about 600k people on free tv after drawing only 386k on Showtime, they might want to let Saunders go first, atleast build Golovkin's name up bigger by winning all 4 title and doing another block-buster show, and maybe let Jacobs take another safe fight in front of 5,000 comp's.

          Comment

          • Derranged
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2005
            • 46593
            • 2,126
            • 1,350
            • 162,628

            #35
            Originally posted by animelive
            It is better if he fights BJS tbh. If he gets all belts, he can sell Jacobs fight and it does need a bit of selling because Jacobs is a no name demanding 3-4 million dollars. Another flop ppv isn't a good idea right now.
            I suppose that makes sense, but I think Golovkin would have to vacate his title if he didn't fight Jacobs.

            Comment

            • Eastcoast
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Aug 2014
              • 8639
              • 288
              • 0
              • 15,501

              #36
              Originally posted by Derranged
              I suppose that makes sense, but I think Golovkin would have to vacate his title if he didn't fight Jacobs.
              That's up to the WBA, they have in their rules they can grant special requests at anytime. In this case, team Jacobs might even be in agreement to delay the fight to March/April of '17.

              Loeffler wouldn't be currently negotiating with Warren for BJS next if he didn't think the WBA would allow it.

              Comment

              • Graz
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • May 2016
                • 2086
                • 51
                • 6
                • 10,052

                #37
                Interesting. In the Eubank/Saunders video interview where Eubanks wanted a rematch with Saunders, GGGs name came up. Eubanks was posturing about GGG. Saunders said "GGG? GGG can beat us both on the same night."

                Comment

                • animelive
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Dec 2015
                  • 919
                  • 26
                  • 13
                  • 8,359

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Derranged
                  I suppose that makes sense, but I think Golovkin would have to vacate his title if he didn't fight Jacobs.
                  Doesn't unification get more priority by WBA? Jacobs can wait. But honestly, it is good to see everyone call out GGG now. They want to get in on the Brook money. We saw Chris BJS and Jacobs asking for a fight when GGG has no fights lined up. That is a step in the right direction.

                  Comment

                  • Derranged
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Oct 2005
                    • 46593
                    • 2,126
                    • 1,350
                    • 162,628

                    #39
                    Originally posted by animelive
                    Doesn't unification get more priority by WBA? Jacobs can wait. But honestly, it is good to see everyone call out GGG now. They want to get in on the Brook money. We saw Chris BJS and Jacobs asking for a fight when GGG has no fights lined up. That is a step in the right direction.
                    That I don't know. But whoever Golovkin decides to fight first, the fans of the guy he didn't chose will claim its a duck. If he fights Saunders, the usual suspects will claim he's afraid of Jacobs' power. If he fights Jacobs, 100 accounts who swear they love Saunders will pop up claiming that *****s give Golovkin nightmares. Its just the way it is.

                    I'd be fine with either or. I just don't wanna see Golovkin fight another cab driver or welterweight.

                    Comment

                    • BoxingFan85
                      THE DEFECATION TEAM
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Apr 2016
                      • 8727
                      • 366
                      • 338
                      • 167,010

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Scott. Weiland
                      Last I saw of BJ Flounders he was video taping men getting naked. Can this be serious ?

                      I am not sure if it was serious, but its funny as fook..

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP