GGG is favored over Canelo but he will get bust up and battered for his trouble

[Mr. Philadel]

If Nelo ante up and face that mfer...I'm sure Nelo ****s him up...I got Nelo winning...Lil G ain't getting better...blame that on his matchmaker

[FrankieClutch]

Both of them would get tested. That's what makes that fight so great and that's why everyone wants to see it. We're going to see how well Canelo copes with pressure and we're going to see how well GGG copes with Canelo's counter punching and combinations. I've always favored GGG 60-40 in that fight and nothing has changed

[Blue Heffner]

B- troll post or in the top ten dumbest things I've read on this forum this year so respect for whatever the case actually is.

Lol...C'mon Pandas, of course I'm trolling. I see who does what better vs the other.

[boxinggod101]

Canelo has a good chance of beating him. To be honest both are overrated. I think if this fight get made it will be a FOTY candidate. Hope it gets done, if Canelo stop ducking...

[puga]

How is it false when every time GGG gets touched up, its because his opponent stood his ground.

Look at the fight with a shot kassim ouma, even Monroe did better standing his ground instead of moving, so did Brooks

just because its your opinion doesn't mean its facts.

GGG is very hittable and doesn't move his head on the inside

it's false because it's basic common sense to not stand your ground when facing a
pressure fighter unless youre better on the inside or want to get stopped earlier.. in canelo's case fighting angulo is one thing, but standing your ground vs a beast like GGG is suicide

[The plunger man]

Having an Angulo or Khan throw and land on you is a world away from a gennady golovkin land in you....how could canelo actually win...he has less movement than triple ggg...terrible going backwards and never knocked out a bonafide middleweight ....it's ok knocking out Khan and beating a smaller cotto....we're talking golovkin here lol....longer reach...ramrod jab and crunching power...canelo has no chance of winning and let's be realistic ...

[The plunger man]

How is it false when every time GGG gets touched up, its because his opponent stood his ground.

Look at the fight with a shot kassim ouma, even Monroe did better standing his ground instead of moving, so did Brooks

just because its your opinion doesn't mean its facts.

GGG is very hittable and doesn't move his head on the inside

Do you realise how ****** you sound pugilist .....your bringing up a few fights where golovkin got hit a few times that's over 6 years old....come on fella.....how can canelo beat him ? ......golovkin has much quicker feet, can knock you out with either hand...relentless attack and late round stamina ....we can also bring up examples of when canelo was staggered in his fights...or totally outboxed by mayweather and Lara ....your grabbing at straws pugilist....canelo will be disected and broken down bit by bit by golovkin inside 8 rounds...even though you don't want to admit you would not lay one dollar on canelo to beat golovkin.....as what a previous poster said ...Triple GGG could quite easily use is ramrod jab and break canelo down systematically and the same he did to lemeuix .......canelo will lose badly to golovkin you know it and so do I

[therealpugilist]

Do you realise how ****** you sound pugilist .....your bringing up a few fights where golovkin got hit a few times that's over 6 years old....come on fella.....how can canelo beat him ? ......golovkin has much quicker feet, can knock you out with either hand...relentless attack and late round stamina ....we can also bring up examples of when canelo was staggered in his fights...or totally outboxed by mayweather and Lara ....your grabbing at straws pugilist....canelo will be disected and broken down bit by bit by golovkin inside 8 rounds...even though you don't want to admit you would not lay one dollar on canelo to beat golovkin.....as what a previous poster said ...Triple GGG could quite easily use is ramrod jab and break canelo down systematically and the same he did to lemeuix .......canelo will lose badly to golovkin you know it and so do I

im grabbing at straws but this guy literally gets tagged when his opponents stand their ground....even no hoper wade

[torosboxing75]

I think Golovkin would approach Canelo with the same caution he fought Lemieux with. He would be very patient and methodical fighting behind the jab and slowly breaking Canelo down. I dont expect to see Golovkin make a street fight out of it and abandon his defense the way he did with Brook.

Exactly this^^^^^^^^^^^^ GGG didn't have a choice but to fight Brook the way he did because Brook is a highly skilled boxer puncher. Canelo is not a highly skilled boxer and has been taking advantage of smaller guys. He doesn't have to respect their power. Canelo's power is about the same as Brooks to be honest.
The only advantage Canelo has is faster hands but at 160 GGG beats Canyellow down!

[The plunger man]

im grabbing at straws but this guy literally gets tagged when his opponents stand their ground....even no hoper wade

Look he's not an elusive and defensive minded fighter...that's not his style....he wins his fights by coming forward and breaking opponents down ....when he faced lemeuix he was hardly touched in that fight and literally beat him with just his powerful jab.....I can give you many offensive fighters that never showed much head movement when they went on the attack...George foreman,Thomas hearns,Aaron Pryor ...there no different to golovkin...they was so confident in there attack that defence became a second thought....any fighter can lose against the right fighter I just don't see anybody capable of beating golovkin at the moment and the only way I see golovkin losing is getting tagged by a massive shot he didn't see coming and I can't see any fighter from up t 168 being able to take his power over the full 12 rounds......he's got bone crunching power fella