I said it yesterday and I'm saying it again. @GGGBoxing let's dance good boy. #MyTurn

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Craveman
    Munchies
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2012
    • 1151
    • 38
    • 47
    • 7,346

    #21
    Originally posted by Chollo Vista
    What about Jacobs dreams?

    What if he wants the WBO belt. Is he not allowed to get it because GGG wants it right now.

    It's just hilarious that GGG wants to fight a man Jacobs can also beat. A man that also ducked Jacobs. And when GGG stops him in 3 rounds, folks will act like it's a miracle as if Jacobs couldn't do it as well.
    Shut up idiot. Now everyone wants the fight, they should've came in the first place when no one wanted to fight Golovkin.

    Jacob could've fought Golovkin on Saturday. So get behind the line, BJS seems to be the priority.

    Comment

    • TripleGFightFan
      Banned
      • Sep 2015
      • 1422
      • 69
      • 0
      • 1,985

      #22
      Quote:
      Originally Posted by Fangedgrowl View Post
      Is this the same guy that said he needs more time to get ready for the fight

      Quote: Posted by Chollo Vista
      This is the same guy that says he wants GGG in December 2016. How about that?

      Quote: Posted by Fangedgrowl
      Man Please how about beating a good fighter besides Mora

      Yeah, you mean like beating Quillin in 88 seconds? You clowns are grueling

      Quote: Fangedgrowl
      Bet Jacobs prices himself out again . Watch

      Quote: Posted by Chollo Vista
      Do you understand what "purse bid" means if negotiations fail?


      Lol...good ****...

      Comment

      • Derranged
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2005
        • 46593
        • 2,126
        • 1,351
        • 162,628

        #23
        Saunders doesn't want to fight Golovkin so the Jacobs fight will have to be made.

        Edit: Since the WBA ordered this fight, wouldn't Golovkin have to vacate if he declined a Jacobs fight? That wouldn't make much sense of he's trying to unify. Jacobs first then Saunders.

        Comment

        • NYC8224
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Aug 2016
          • 1238
          • 42
          • 0
          • 1,623

          #24
          Originally posted by Weltschmerz
          A twitter remark means **** all and is certainly not thread worthy
          Too many ****** people here think big fights are negotiated on twitter. Weirdos

          Comment

          • Robbie Barrett
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Nov 2013
            • 40891
            • 2,779
            • 667
            • 570,921

            #25
            Originally posted by NYC8224
            Too many ****** people here think big fights are negotiated on twitter. Weirdos
            The first step of making a fight is letting the other side know you want it. This has been done countless times in the media be it by TV, Radio or Twitter. BTW Eddie Hearn has admitted contacting fighters on Twitter to put fights together. You really don't know what the **** you're talking about.

            Comment

            • _Maxi
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Feb 2015
              • 8977
              • 508
              • 718
              • 91,740

              #26
              Originally posted by Chollo Vista
              Jacobs can't get belts?

              Is GGG the only one allowed to get belts???

              You don't want Jacobs to fight BJS or GGG next, so what the hell is Jacobs supposed to do in the meantime? Fight Sergio Mora for the 3rd time?

              You guys are ridiculous. The only ones allowed to get belts is GGG
              WTF you talk about. Golovkin is not avoiding any mandatory.

              Unification has priority over mandatory, that's it.

              Comment

              • _Maxi
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Feb 2015
                • 8977
                • 508
                • 718
                • 91,740

                #27
                Originally posted by Derranged
                Saunders doesn't want to fight Golovkin so the Jacobs fight will have to be made.

                Edit: Since the WBA ordered this fight, wouldn't Golovkin have to vacate if he declined a Jacobs fight? That wouldn't make much sense of he's trying to unify. Jacobs first then Saunders.
                Unification has priority over mandatory. That's how I read here.

                Comment

                • Robbie Barrett
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Nov 2013
                  • 40891
                  • 2,779
                  • 667
                  • 570,921

                  #28
                  Canelo will get the BJS fight, he has more to offer.

                  Comment

                  • Zen_Fighter
                    Contender
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 382
                    • 11
                    • 0
                    • 7,097

                    #29
                    I like Jacobs. He will get his shot and it won't end well for him. Props for calling out GGG!

                    Comment

                    • nubianpiye
                      John Snow dies
                      • Jul 2014
                      • 2264
                      • 200
                      • 230
                      • 38,432

                      #30
                      Shows how bad Glolovkin looked everyone wants to fight him now.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP