Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Jacobs vs Golovkin NOW!!!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by anthonydavid11 View Post
    I think Golovkin squashes Jacobs but it would be nice to know for sure. I think he blazes through Saunders as well, but he'd have all the belts at that point and moving up would seem natural. I do want to see him in a 50/50 fight.
    Yeah, they'res nothing wrong with saying who you think would win..that's what having an opinion is all about.. but when people open up there ass cheeks and say no i don't wanna see a fight between the top two middleweights because they're afraid that there is a chance their fighter might lose is cowardly.

    Comment


    • #22
      I'm very excited for Golovkin/Jacobs, still heartbroken we never got Golovkin/Quillin.

      I only wish Danny had been more active and built a better resume before fighting Golovkin. GGG haters will trash Jacobs after this fight.

      Comment


      • #23
        How the hell did this go from people yelling for the WBA to enforce the mandatory to people not wanting to see this fight now?

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by sidneycello View Post
          Yeah, they'res nothing wrong with saying who you think would win..that's what having an opinion is all about.. but when people open up there ass cheeks and say no i don't wanna see a fight between the top two middleweights because they're afraid that there is a chance their fighter might lose is cowardly.
          Oh I'm not afraid to see anybody lose. If Danny Jacobs is good enough to crush Golovkin, I want to see it. And then I want to see a fighter come along who can crush him and so on. The best vs the best no matter what. It keeps the sport interesting. No guy reigns forever anyway, no matter how great he is. They are humans after all. By 2020, most of these top guys won't be there anymore. It's life. It keeps going. I just love 50/50 fights where both risk a lot in terms of career and status and all. It's so much more fun.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by anthonydavid11 View Post
            Oh I'm not afraid to see anybody lose. If Danny Jacobs is good enough to crush Golovkin, I want to see it. And then I want to see a fighter come along who can crush him and so on. The best vs the best no matter what. It keeps the sport interesting. No guy reigns forever anyway, no matter how great he is. They are humans after all. By 2020, most of these top guys won't be there anymore. It's life. It keeps going. I just love 50/50 fights where both risk a lot in terms of career and status and all. It's so much more fun.
            I agree 1000%!!!

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by sidneycello View Post
              use common sense...which opponent that Golovkin has beaten wouldve beaten Pirog or Jacobs for that matter...dont worry i'll wait. lemme guess ISHIDA!!! LMAO!!
              Look, this isn't a debate. Golovkin is better than Jacobs until he (Jacobs) proves otherwise, the Don has spoken friend.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by sidneycello View Post
                Yeah, they'res nothing wrong with saying who you think would win..that's what having an opinion is all about.. but when people open up there ass cheeks and say no i don't wanna see a fight between the top two middleweights because they're afraid that there is a chance their fighter might lose is cowardly.
                Sidneycello dropping truthful ***els in this thread

                Green sent

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View Post
                  How the hell did this go from people yelling for the WBA to enforce the mandatory to people not wanting to see this fight now?
                  You already know why

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by ComicDon View Post
                    Look, this isn't a debate. Golovkin is better than Jacobs until he (Jacobs) proves otherwise, the Don has spoken friend.
                    The only way for him to prove otherwise is by fighting him, right? Triangle theories in boxing doesn't work.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View Post
                      The only way for him to prove otherwise is by fighting him, right? Triangle theories in boxing doesn't work.
                      Yes Jacobs has to first prove he's not a coward by fighting him and second prove his better by beating him in the ring. It's a tall mountain to climb but I'm sure the Miracle Man can at least do the first step.

                      But until he actually wins he's the inferior fighter. If they never fight he will always be seen as the inferior fighter, That's why he needs to suck is up and get into the ring and looking for a retirement check.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP