Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Brook v Canelo - who you got?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by puga View Post
    i guess it's safe to say brook is better and stronger than trout

    and i dont believe canelo beat trout
    yep, and brook went life and death with carson jones....
    heck, even some said cottos brother almost killed canelo...
    or even more, some also said "el titere " outboxed and embarassed canelo, lol...

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by icha View Post
      yep, and brook went life and death with carson jones....
      heck, even some said cottos brother almost killed canelo...
      or even more, some also said "el titere " outboxed and embarassed canelo, lol...
      youre as good as your last fight they say and i gotta admit brook performed pretty good last night despite jumping 2 weightclasses vs the strongest champion who no one wants to fight

      and trout and brook are both good range fighters thus the relevance of them being brought up

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by puga View Post
        youre as good as your last fight they say and i gotta admit brook performed pretty good last night despite jumping 2 weightclasses vs the strongest champion who no one wants to fight

        and trout and brook are both good range fighters thus the relevance of them being brought up
        trout is far from canelos last fight, so you just proved my point...
        to this point brooks best win is porter and that doesnt even prove he is the best at 147, let alone 154... let him beat a top 5 at 154 at least, then we can talk...

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by icha View Post
          trout is far from canelos last fight, so you just proved my point...
          to this point brooks best win is porter and that doesnt even prove he is the best at 147, let alone 154... let him beat a top 5 at 154 at least, then we can talk...
          porter was top 5 ww or atleast borderline. you act as if canelo has beaten the who's who of his divisions when truth is his best wins were controversial ,he does not deserve to be a snob at this point atleast not a fighter like brook

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by puga View Post
            porter was top 5 ww or atleast borderline. you act as if canelo has beaten the who's who of his divisions when truth is his best wins were controversial ,he does not deserve to be a snob at this point atleast not a fighter like brook
            even close wins are wins, and trout, cotto and lara are better than anything gggs and brooks resumes combined....

            Comment


            • #36
              I actually think 154 would be the perfect weight class for Brook. I actually think he would give Canelo a 12 round war. We've seen guys with speed like Floyd, Lara, and too a lesser extent Trout give Canelo trouble. I'd stick with Canelo for now but I really think Brook could be a problem for him.

              Brook definitely gained a lot last night. He could definitely cash in with Canelo, Cotto, and Khan in his next few fights. Make a lot of money and maybe even start to stack that resume.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by icha View Post
                even close wins are wins, and trout, cotto and lara are better than anything gggs and brooks resumes combined....
                a questionable win is bordering a loss, it only looks good on paper

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by puga View Post
                  a questionable win is bordering a loss, it only looks good on paper
                  none of those wins are questionable, they are fights that could have gone either way , that happes often when the best fight the best... you prob have a different opinion but it doesnt make it a fact, no matter how much you cry, none of those fights are considered robberies , they are still legit wins...
                  i will understand if any of those fights was pac-bradley type of fight, but this is not the case...

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by icha View Post
                    none of those wins are questionable, they are fights that could have gone either way , that happes often when the best fight the best... you prob have a different opinion but it doesnt make it a fact, no matter how much you cry, none of those fights are considered robberies , they are still legit wins...
                    i will understand if any of those fights was pac-bradley type of fight, but this is not the case...
                    the whole scoring system in the trout fight was definitely questionable stunk with corruption

                    can you really brag about wins than can be debated as losses? thats just like bragging about sleeping with beautiful women who were once men

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by puga View Post
                      the whole scoring system in the trout fight was definitely questionable stunk with corruption

                      can you really brag about wins than can be debated as losses? thats just like bragging about sleeping with beautiful women who were once men
                      So close fights should be considered losses now... again if bradley brags about beating pac is one thing, but this is a whole different story... plenty of close fights in the history of boxing ..

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP