So two judges had brook winning 3-1

[WesternChamp]

you guys need to watch the fight again. i know when you watch it live with all the excitement you can score it incorrectly. fight wasnt even close. brook landed a few good shots thats about it, was he not suppose to land anything on ggg??. why is this suppose to be an accomplishment or something? i had it 3-1, and ggg was on his way to win that 5th round too.

[The Akbar One]

The other one had the fight 2-2

Were you scoring them same way?

I had it 2-2 being as objective as possible.

If this fight went the distance GGG would've been robbed. Canelo-like judges.

What do you think?

I had it 3-1 Golovkin, and was rooting for Brook. The fix was in plain and simple. Luckily for GGG, he busted that eye socket early on, otherwise he would have found out what Dirrell found out, that you have to win by KO in the UK against their big name guy. Golovkin outpunched Brook in every round outside of probably the second. How Brook was given three rounds by two judges needs to be investigated. If Golovkin loses, I want it to be fair, as opposed to crooked scorecards and a robbery.

[The Akbar One]

you guys need to watch the fight again. i know when you watch it live with all the excitement you can score it incorrectly. fight wasnt even close. brook landed a few good shots thats about it, was he not suppose to land anything on ggg??. why is this suppose to be an accomplishment or something? i had it 3-1, and ggg was on his way to win that 5th round too.

Brook was getting that legendary UK x3 mutliplier.

[GGGKovaBeast]

Golovkin 1, 3 and 4. Brooks only won the second round.

[FrankieBruno]

I gave Brook round 2 and thats it

It was all GGG from there on out

He was slowly but surly walking away with the fight, Brooks legs were gone

[nacho daddy]

you guys need to watch the fight again. i know when you watch it live with all the excitement you can score it incorrectly. fight wasnt even close. brook landed a few good shots thats about it, was he not suppose to land anything on ggg??. why is this suppose to be an accomplishment or something? i had it 3-1, and ggg was on his way to win that 5th round too.

exactly. I watched it here where the guy posted the video and all kell crook won was half the 2nd round

[daggum]

Both of those lefts barely touched him. He fell over his right foot trying to back up.

Please stop. I'm a Golovkin fan and you give all of us a bad name by saying you had it 3-1 with a KD.

barely touched him? it landed flush on the temple and thats why he went down. he lost his legs because of the punch. their feet didn't touch each otehr until he was on the way down. that doesn't make it a slip. it should have been 3-1 with a KD. has nothing to do with being a fan. just being an accurate judge and scoring based on the more effective punches.

[nacho daddy]

I had it 3-1 Golovkin, and was rooting for Brook. The fix was in plain and simple. Luckily for GGG, he busted that eye socket early on, otherwise he would have found out what Dirrell found out, that you have to win by KO in the UK against their big name guy. Golovkin outpunched Brook in every round outside of probably the second. How Brook was given three rounds by two judges needs to be investigated. If Golovkin loses, I want it to be fair, as opposed to crooked scorecards and a robbery.

I think they will do the same for sergi vs mental ward scoring it for ward

[daggum]

I think they will do the same for sergi vs mental ward scoring it for ward

course they will. if kovalev doesnt win by knockout he loses. he will be schooled even if he deserves to win a decision. we saw the same thing in pac/floyd but on a much bigger level when pac landed more legit punches(sticking your arm out and pushing the other guys face away is not a punch) and landed far better punches with the better defense. he was schooled! because...because it was a boring fight? because he didnt kill floyd? because he boxed therefore he auto-loses? if their names weren't pac and floyd it would have been a different result.

[creekrat77]

I don't think Brook was winning. I mean I rewatched the fight and Golovkin was blocking everything he was throwing. It was futile for Brook to turn the tide because the shots he was ripping were largely not going to count. It was too much energy to keep up that toe to toe strategy of merely beating him to the punch whilst getting walked down by Golovkins hard jab and body shots. Brook was smart and started to back up with a rope a dope strategy. Before his corner through in the towel he was hardly throwing letting Golovkin wail on him. Might of been the only winning strategy for him. Would have been interesting to see Golovkin get tired in deep water because it was obvious Golovkin was letting everything go not planning on going the distance