That's good. It should be obvious to anyone by now. Golovkin is a good but limited guy who can punch very hard and that's it. There are no other special aspects to his game.
Calling yourself BoxingXpert? Are you kidding??? What a joke
Honestly the average IQ in this place must be around 90. Golovkin has no skills because of one brawl? Have you watched his career?
Yeah, I saw him. How limited fighters like Stevens and Murray and that American guy (Wilson or something?) were hitting him over and over again because of his bad defense. He got an okay jaw, though, but Brook was able to shake it round 1 when he turned Golovkin's legs into jelly.
That video is one of the worse skill videos i've seen. I could make one of Charlie Z look better than that. Golovkin misses a punch, gets hit in the face by Stevens and he calls it shoulder defence.
Doubt he'd take the same approach he did with Brook to fight Froch.
Absolutely, only a boxing fück wit would suggest so or TheBoxingFückwit. GGG is a top talent, one of the most complete boxer punchers we've seen, whilst I enjoy his style he could have won that fight easier and earlier had he picked his shots better he was loading up on EVERYTHING, he wasnt wrong about putting on a show but it kind of detracted from his performance from a boxing purists point of view I suppose.
The shots he shipped he would never had taken if he perceived Brook as a threat. I've followed GGG longer than most, lost a little interest along the way but watching his interviews after the fight I attached myself to the wagon again. I still want to see him clear out 168 rather than stick around 160, he should avoid a CW or 175 for Ward though.
Comment