Is the brook golokin undercard any good?

Collapse
X
Collapse
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • slimshandy69
    I HAVE ***** TATTOO!
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Aug 2009
    • 3642
    • 323
    • 3
    • 16,514
    #1

    Is the brook golokin undercard any good?

    Everyone is on about main event, but what is you guys opinion on the under card, any gems?
    Tags: brook, golokin, good?, undercard
    • Madison Boxing
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jul 2015
      • 35364
      • 6,455
      • 3,367
      • 190,590
      #2
      the undercard is complete ****

        Comment

        • mannysavage
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • May 2016
          • 388
          • 21
          • 2
          • 6,919
          #3
          Originally posted by bigdramashow
          the undercard is complete ****
          Yep its pretty fking bad, will only be watching the main event, Lee Haskins vs Stuart Hall 2 really doesnt interest me whatsoever

            Comment

            • Citizen Koba
              Deplorable Peacenik
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jun 2013
              • 20457
              • 3,951
              • 3,801
              • 2,875,273
              #4
              Haskins - Hall and showcase fights for Mundo and Kid Galahad. Nothing to write home about.

                Comment

                • jmrf4435
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jun 2014
                  • 8397
                  • 772
                  • 14
                  • 66,112
                  #5
                  My biggest critisism is the under card. They could at least threw someone of note on there

                    Comment

                    • jmrf4435
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jun 2014
                      • 8397
                      • 772
                      • 14
                      • 66,112
                      #6
                      Wasn't saunders supposed to be on there and pulled out?

                        Comment

                        • Robbie Barrett
                          Banned
                          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                          • Nov 2013
                          • 40891
                          • 2,779
                          • 667
                          • 570,921
                          #7
                          Originally posted by jmrf4435
                          Wasn't saunders supposed to be on there and pulled out?
                          Are you crazy Warren wouldn't let him on Hearns undercard. He was supposed to be on the Canelo-Smith undercard.

                            Comment

                            • jmrf4435
                              Undisputed Champion
                              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                              • Jun 2014
                              • 8397
                              • 772
                              • 14
                              • 66,112
                              #8
                              "Are you crazy Warren wouldn't let him on Hearns undercard. He was supposed to be on the Canelo-Smith undercard."

                              Got it mixed up. THanks!

                                Comment

                                Previous template Next
                                Working...
                                TOP

                                Sign In

                                Forgot password?

                                Register

                                Get in on the latest boxing conversations in our Forum and comment on articles.
                                JOIN NOW