Mayweather won easily but there wasn't anything impressive about Mayweather's performance IMO either. He landed like 10 punches a round and took a big drop performance wise compared to any other opponent he's faced.
In all actuality Mayweather-Pacquiao was a stalemate more than anything
Collapse
-
Floyd's win should be changed to a no contest.
Manny should keep his L though, he let everyone and himself down.
But judging by the way some fans act, you would think that Floyd beat Pac from pillar to post and gave him the most one sided savage beating of all-time.
I agree it should be changed to a no contest due to floyd taking that illegal iv.
There is no excuse for cheatingComment
-
breakdown as follows:
Defense, What is it all about?
Do you have great defense if you got hit more?
Nope!
Ring Generalship, do you have great ring generalship if the whole time you are running around away from the center of the ring?
Nope!
Did Floyd win in his home town Vegas? Yes
Did Floyd deserve the win for that controversial fight when evidence points out who truly connected more per round that night was actually not floyd the running hugging ***** boxer, but the guy from ASIA.. Does Floyd deserve that win for that poor showing?
Answer: A RESOUNDING
NOPE!
You truly are the true winner that night PAC. You can raise your head high for what Floyd got that night was an empty win.
Punching to connect is the name of the game in boxing. I have shown proof Pac connected the more clean and effective punching that night, not to mention the more punches per rounds in this fight.
That said. To have effective aggression, you have to hit your opponent with clean effective punching, more so than your opponent per round. - Pac did
Ring generalship- ring generalship is he who controls the center of the ring and controls his opponent to place him were he wants him to be and while doing that landing the more effective blows than his opponent. - Pac again did that. He commanded the center of the ring pushed Floyd back whenever he wants to over and over to the ropes for 12 rounds while doing so also landed the cleaner more effective punches.
Defense- defense is to not get hit, so who did get hit more throughout the fight? As I have proven in this thread Floyd got hit more per round. Shows who's defense had more holes.
Clean and effective punching: It means those punches landed with intent and the gravity of the punches is how you measure it's significance per round.
Even if you have aggression if you can't hit your opponent effectively your aggression is not an effective aggression.
Even if you have ring generalship, but you can't land effectively on your opponent then your ring generalship ain't that great.
Defense, if you get hit more than your opponent. Then your defense is weaker than your opponent.
You cannot have good ring generalship, good defense, effective aggression if you hit less than your opponent.
Pac did that with flying colors. He Landed the significant punches, landed the cleaner more effective punches and above all landed the more punches.
I've shown proof landed the more significant punches per rounds that were disputed is actually Pac's!Comment
-
The most boring "Big Fight" since Holyfield vs Lewis in November of '99. But I still blame Pac more than I do Floyd. Floyd is gonna fight the way he does, and it is the burden of his opponent to make things more interesting. Penetrate his defense, force him out of his element, etc. and you might have an exciting fight on your hands. Castillo did it, Judah did it, Cotto kinda did it, Maidana did it the first time around, etc. Pac failed to do it, even after years and years of hype. I'm not a Mayweather fanboy, but at least cast the blame (the bulk of it anyway) where it belongs.Last edited by KLockard23; 09-09-2016, 09:22 PM.Comment
-
in reference to other sports:
A 3 pointer in the nba is a rewind away to know if it's a legit 3 pointer.
An outside bounce of the ball for both tennis and NBA can be seen in a replay.
A lot of sports are using rewind to see what transpired.
Now to see who really connected more throughout the fight.
Here's a thororugh breakdown of the fight. Unedited/ unspliced, 3 minute of every round dissected for the world to see.
And here it is:
Chronicles of the Biggest sports Heist in History
When there is a crime you look at clues of events that transpired.You trace the evidences that are left.
People Lie, but what doesn't lie are evidences trapped in time in a form of a video of the truth that transpired in that strange night of boxing.
It's very obvious when you watch the fight that Mayweather was missing badly, but the judges were counting them.
Slowmo video is meant to show who really connected in that round and who truly deserved it. It is even more accurate because you can tell which punches really connected throughout the fight.
We need to spread this brilliant video so the fans can see who really won the fight. But I knew the fight was a joke from the beginning because Pacquiao wasn't gonna get his hands raised in Vegas.
Here is the truth. The rounds that should have gone to Manny. Rounds that if it were counted correctly. It would have made it 9-4 for Pac,
Since these 5 rounds in these videos were given to floyd, when in fact it shouldnt have.
There are 5 videos, of 8 rounds, rounds 2,3,6,7,8,9,10,12
in these videos.
Rounds 2,3,7,8,12 were given to Floyd unanimously (video disputed)
Rounds 9,10 only 1 judge gave to Floyd (video disputed)
Round 4 and 6 are unanimous to Pac on all 3 judges.
The 7 rounds are in question. If Pac gets the 7 rounds plus the 2 unanimous rounds. It's a 9/3 Pac.
Judge for yourself.
Unbiased video showing all of landed shots of both parties per 3 minute round. Unedited, unspliced round by round documented shots.
Enjoy! Pac was the true winner.
Round 2
Round 3
Round 6,7,8
Those who want to dispute the author's work. Time stamp it and let's discuss, but I assure you it's all there in it's purest form.
Enjoy!Comment
-
4th and 5th videos here:
Floyd about Manny:
When Floyd was asked who was his top three toughest opponent, he was quoted by boxingscene.com: "I can say that none of them were easy. Although I must say that Canelo was tough....Miguel Cotto [was tough]. Manny Pacquiao was very tough. Pacquiao is very good. He was better than I thought."
Round 9,10
Round 12
[/QUOTE]
Nacho about Floyd: The kid caved. Over defensive on the most important fight of his life.
"He knew he was supported by the judges to give a luck luster fight."
"He (floyd) lost so much credibility"
"the only one throwing punches was Pacquiao"
"how can they gave the rounds to a guy who even looks ridiculous running away scared?"
"or giving hugs to turn off the fight?"
# rematch written all over the place. Floyd needs to redeem himself with this poor display of boxing.Comment
-
It was just another fight for floyd. All you manny fans are the ones that hyped his ass up as if he was going to do something different. Not floyds fault, he just did he always said he would do. It was easy work. Blame the media and manny fans for the hype manny couldnt live up to.
Lets face it no one whooped anyone's ass. This was not a real boxing match. This was a big hit for boxing as a sport. But it would have been best if the referee called the fight off after the 7th rd. The best outcome would have been a no decision.
TBE?! The Bestrunner Ever!!!Hugging and running is called boxing?!How can you hit Mayweather when he is running fast like a ferrari?!LOL!!! Nothing to be proud of really. All that was an exercise of how to rip of boxing fans.
Comment
-
You can't use that as the rubric to determine how a boxing is won, that's arbitrary and BS. You go by the official rules. You can't set up in that context just because you believe what the public thought. No, as a boxing match Mayweather ran, held and fought scared, terrified of throwing combos. He fought out of character and used smoke and mirrors to get a cheap win. It wasn't a Mayweather win by definition. It was a scam.
It makes me laugh after all these years of talking saying manny will destroy floyd and he didnt do jack **** Floyd clearly dictated the fight because it wasnt the fight manny or his fans expected or wanted it to be now the history books show Floyd won and all this crying and forensic videos wont change itComment
-
What are you talking about going by the public? I saw the fight with my own eyes Mayweather won there was no controversy and whats the case for Pac winning? Slow motion videos? Ridiculous that people have to resort to that get over it these pac fans are insane JMM had to almost kill him to get ppl to accept he won
It makes me laugh after all these years of talking saying manny will destroy floyd and he didnt do jack **** Floyd clearly dictated the fight because it wasnt the fight manny or his fans expected or wanted it to be now the history books show Floyd won and all this crying and forensic videos wont change it
Nacho about Floyd: The kid caved. Over defensive on the most important fight of his life.
"He knew he was supported by the judges to give a luck luster fight."
"He (floyd) lost so much credibility"
"the only one throwing punches was Pacquiao"
"how can they gave the rounds to a guy who even looks ridiculous running away scared?"
"or giving hugs to turn off the fight?"
# rematch written all over the place. Floyd needs to redeem himself with this poor display of boxing.Comment
Comment