Golovkin predicts first rd KO

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • -Johannes-
    GolovKING!
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2009
    • 2486
    • 202
    • 115
    • 9,438

    #21
    Originally posted by Golovkin
    AFTER the news of Gennady being poisoned, WE'LL SEE. ****ing dirty, Golovkin will show why he is considered the greatest fighter, even poisoned will destroy Brook.
    Yeah the poison will only make it worse for Crook. Gennady will be pissed! This fight won't make it past the 2 minute mark 2:10 tops!

    Comment

    • Motorcity Cobra
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Mar 2016
      • 32565
      • 1,106
      • 545
      • 963,610

      #22
      Originally posted by Joe Beamish
      You think so? I can't tell what he's saying, and furthermore in what context. It's like an edited-in quote.

      It's crap. There's no way Golovkin is going all-out to get a first round KO. He's going to play it smart and read his opponent first. This is a midround stoppage, not a first round one, and Golovkin wouldn't think it is himself.
      Listen to the first video. Then listen to the second video. God damn I did all the work. You need me to explain the context to?

      Comment

      • Graz
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2016
        • 2086
        • 51
        • 6
        • 10,052

        #23
        Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra
        Well if you took the time to click the links i posted you would hear him say it. Not only did I post the links I posted them to the exact spot. You don't even have to search the video. I already did that for u. All you gotta do is hit click
        Cobra I went back and watched both YouTube videos. Nelson implied that GGG said it was essentially easy work but Nelson followed with "well he didn't say exactly that" but..... The second video shows GGG in the ring and he says "after 1st round it's finished" but it may be completely out of context because we don't know who or what situation he's talking about. Brooks name is not mentioned in that statement nor is a question asked about Brook prior to him saying it.

        Comment

        • Joe Beamish
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Aug 2014
          • 3475
          • 157
          • 42
          • 30,582

          #24
          Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra
          Listen to the first video. Then listen to the second video. God damn I did all the work. You need me to explain the context to?
          The first video is hearsay. The second clip is a single sentence from Golovkin that is edited into some Sanchez interview clips. Golovkin could be talking about anyone or anything, and he's clearly aware that he's on camera anyway. Sanchez is talking about the upcoming fight with Brook. But Golovkin, who knows? He could be talking about a hypothetical situation; we the viewers can't know because the single quote has been edited to appear continuous with what Sanchez is talking about. But it isn't.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP