How can GGG v brook be a mismatch?

[-PBP-]

GGG has been called one dimensional, a hypejob, a one division coward, overrated, crude etc. Yet people on here say GGG v brook its a mismatch and give a 36-0 fighter absolutely no chance of beating him? So if hes such a limited fighter, how come people dont think theres any possibility that someone like kell brook might be able to outbox him?

According to who? I thought the criticism of GGG was exceptional talent/poor resume. His critics don't question his skill they question his level of opposition.

If he wasn't a great fighter there wouldn't be demands for him to do the things that the great fighters of the past have done.

[b00g13man]

Just fellate the guy already, damn. We won't judge you OP.

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

Kell Brook is good; he may even be "special"; the idea that he's going to walk into a fight, fleshy, against a "big punching MW" who's basically mastered boiling his body down to make 160/159, is a big ask.

I don't think most people actually understand how important this is.

Some people keep trying to justify this fight by saying Brook is bigger or the same size as GGG. But that's not how it works. That's not all there is to it.