Comments Thread For: Ricky Hatton: Golovkin a Punching Machine, Big Ask For Brook

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46545
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Ricky Hatton: Golovkin a Punching Machine, Big Ask For Brook

    Manchester legend Ricky Hatton believes IBF welterweight champion Kell Brook (36-0, 25KOs) has taken a step too far when it comes to his upcoming fight.

    [Click Here To Read More]
  • boxingitis
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Sep 2013
    • 6646
    • 1,905
    • 18
    • 23,227

    #2
    GGG is too Much for anyone 160 and below. That's
    Sergio Martinez, Cotto, Quillen, Jacobs, Saunders, Eubank Jr, Canelo, and Lara.
    Too many vaginas in the sport. They ain't making money anyways fighting nobodies, just fight the guy. Canelo vs GGG would probably make four times what the Canelo vs Smith is making.
    Last edited by boxingitis; 09-04-2016, 04:22 PM.

    Comment

    • aboutfkntime
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2015
      • 47365
      • 1,631
      • 3,563
      • 391,308

      #3
      Originally posted by boxingitis
      GGG is too Much for anyone below 160 and below. That's
      Sergio Martinez, Cotto, Quillen, Jacobs, Saunders, Eubank Jr, Canelo, and Lara.
      Too many vaginas in the sport. They ain't making money anyways fighting nobodies, just fight the guy. Canelo vs GGG would probably make four times what the Canelo vs Smith is making.

      I completely disagree.

      At 154, Canelo and Lara BOTH beat Golovkin, and Cotto gives him hell.

      And Mayweather beats him, EASY !

      Golovkin simply would not be the same fighter at 154.

      You should have said 160..... because Golovkin will never fight below 160, he is TOTALLY full-of-****.

      If he was ever going to fight below 160, he would have negotiated with Cotto and Canelo.

      At 160 I would favor Golovkin over pretty much everyone..... but I suspect that Jacobs/Saunders both have a chance, and I know that Canelo does.

      Not sure if any of those fights will ever happen, I doubt it.

      Comment

      • boxingitis
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Sep 2013
        • 6646
        • 1,905
        • 18
        • 23,227

        #4
        Originally posted by aboutfkntime
        I completely disagree.

        At 154, Canelo and Lara BOTH beat Golovkin, and Cotto gives him hell.

        And Mayweather beats him, EASY !

        Golovkin simply would not be the same fighter at 154.

        You should have said 160..... because Golovkin will never fight below 160, he is TOTALLY full-of-****.

        If he was ever going to fight below 160, he would have negotiated with Cotto and Canelo.

        At 160 I would favor Golovkin over pretty much everyone..... but I suspect that Jacobs/Saunders both have a chance, and I know that Canelo does.

        Not sure if any of those fights will ever happen, I doubt it.

        Of course Chocolatito would be GGG at 115 pounds. Canelo only went south 2 pounds to fight Mayweather Nautural 147 Welterweight, but expects GGG to drop 5 or 6 pounds to fight him. You want GGG to drain himself to lose. Canelo would lose to Khan at 147, your comparison is absurd. What was the offer from Canelo at 155 pounds for the GGG fight, money wise?
        Last edited by boxingitis; 09-04-2016, 05:02 PM.

        Comment

        • Bossman15
          Big OG
          • Jul 2015
          • 347
          • 23
          • 266
          • 11,399

          #5
          Originally posted by aboutfkntime
          I completely disagree.

          At 154, Canelo and Lara BOTH beat Golovkin, and Cotto gives him hell.

          And Mayweather beats him, EASY !

          Golovkin simply would not be the same fighter at 154.

          You should have said 160..... because Golovkin will never fight below 160, he is TOTALLY full-of-****.

          If he was ever going to fight below 160, he would have negotiated with Cotto and Canelo.

          At 160 I would favor Golovkin over pretty much everyone..... but I suspect that Jacobs/Saunders both have a chance, and I know that Canelo does.

          Not sure if any of those fights will ever happen, I doubt it.
          I definately agree anyone below 160 gives him problems I also see Ward confusing him too but the thing I hate is the fact that people think he would knock Floyd out he doesn't have a chance with Floyd's speed movement Ring I.Q. Golovkin would struggle I'd love for him to face Andrade or J-Rock those fights would look very good if he came down

          Comment

          • speakthetruth
            Banned
            • Aug 2016
            • 89
            • 10
            • 0
            • 155

            #6
            Kell Brook has balls & courage that Saunders and Eubank lack

            But can Kell Brook take the GGG power shots? Brits are not known for taking abuse and Brits usually quit and give up. Kell has talent and speed but does Kell have HEART? Great balls taking the GGG challenge but what does a KO loss prove? Fricking nothing. Dumb ass brook should have fought Garcia or Thurman or even Spence. Dumb decision think Pavlik vs Hopkins. Brits lack that internal courage that makes a fighter great.

            Comment

            • DonSimon87
              Contender
              • Sep 2013
              • 201
              • 11
              • 0
              • 6,745

              #7
              Originally posted by speakthetruth
              But can Kell Brook take the GGG power shots? Brits are not known for taking abuse and Brits usually quit and give up. Kell has talent and speed but does Kell have HEART? Great balls taking the GGG challenge but what does a KO loss prove? Fricking nothing. Dumb ass brook should have fought Garcia or Thurman or even Spence. Dumb decision think Pavlik vs Hopkins. Brits lack that internal courage that makes a fighter great.
              Brits usually quit? Care to name some world level Brits that have 'quit'?

              Comment

              • MDPopescu
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2012
                • 24153
                • 1,504
                • 2,009
                • 4,138,611

                #8
                Originally posted by DonSimon87
                Brits usually quit? Care to name some world level Brits that have 'quit'?
                Brits don't quit! They fight to death...

                Comment

                • speakthetruth
                  Banned
                  • Aug 2016
                  • 89
                  • 10
                  • 0
                  • 155

                  #9
                  Originally posted by DonSimon87
                  Brits usually quit? Care to name some world level Brits that have 'quit'?
                  Brits are known the world over as a weak people. Fake queens and wimp princes. Small island now over run with ******s and only can pick on weaker Ireland for power plays. No Brits are laughed at for being girly and weak. Look at the Brits without bursting into Laughter?

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP