Comments Thread For: WBA Declines To Sanction Golovkin-Brook Middleweight Bout

[_Maxi]

So much for the BS that all GGG cares about was the middleweight defense streak. Ruined that streak to fight a WW and drag him up to 160? AFTER he spent the same calendar year criticizing Canelo for bringing a WW up 1 weight class he did worse. Not that anyone but GGG fanboys cared about that bogus streak in the first place with fake titles he never won in the ring and jr titles that were later upgraded. GGG is a joke and glad none of these organizations are getting behind this garbage.

He's not ruining the streak you assh0le. This fight just wouldn't sum, that's it. If he moved up to 168, it's the same situation.

[Robbie Barrett]

No it doesn't. Just means that this bout will not be contabilized in the WBA defenses count. How ****** you are man, you're terribly obsessed with him.

Oh really which title will he be defending for the 16th time against Brook?

The record is for consecutive defences of a MW title. That is now over for Golovkin.

[_Maxi]

This is not new. The WBA said this like three weeks ago and it was posted here...

Poor people finding anything in order to criticize.

[Can'tHoldMeBack]

WBA is the worst organization in Boxing. Really. All this super champ, regular champ, sparring partner champ, etc. crap. Who cares. If i remember correctly didn't Guillermo Jones hold the title for like a year and a half without defending it. Isn't it amazing too at all the haters on here. I am not even a GGG fan, however some of these posters are the biggest haters on these boards. Racially motivated too. What's going to happen when Jacobs ducks again? What are they going to say?

Hey crackbaby Jacobs didn't duck because WBA didn't mandate it like they was suppose to if lil vagina/canelita fight didn't happen and guess what else it won't be a duck if he ask for a nice payday just like lil vagina doing for fight with ginger ****e now dude thinks he deserves 50/50 against cinnamon when he can't even sell his a$$ out a wet paper bag

[Can'tHoldMeBack]

He's not ruining the streak you assh0le. This fight just wouldn't sum, that's it. If he moved up to 168, it's the same situation.

The streak is for consecutive defenses...

[Can'tHoldMeBack]

This is not new. The WBA said this like three weeks ago and it was posted here...

Poor people finding anything in order to criticize.

They said they would make a ruling in coming weeks if they would sanction bout as a defense and the ruling was just handed down, put down the lil g kool aid it's killing your brain cells

[_Maxi]

Oh really which title will he be defending for the 16th time against Brook?

The record is for consecutive defences of a MW title. That is now over for Golovkin.

Consecutive means without a loss in the middle. If he moved down or up for a single fight he wouldn't be defending the MWs titles either for that bout.

Anyway it still counts as a MW world title fight so I don't understand your ******ity.

[doubletake]

contabilized

Is that actually a real word?

[PivotandRoll]

Won't matter one bit to GGG or anybody else....look at all the GGG haters trolling this article....bunch of idiots...

It won't matter to Kell Brook that he's fighting for one less title? are you serious? If I was Kell i'd be pissed. GGG should owe kell a few 100k for that. He was supposed to fight the MW champ for his titles not 2/3 of them.

[Robbie Barrett]

Consecutive means without a loss in the middle. If he moved down or up for a single fight he wouldn't be defending the MWs titles either for that bout.

Anyway it still counts as a MW world title fight so I don't understand your ******ity.

consecutive
kənˈsɛkjʊtɪv/
adjective
adjective: consecutive

1.
following each other continuously.