Now, George Foreman is one of my favourite fighters. He's a respectable individual. He got manners, he got intelligence and he speaks from the hearth, being more humble than any other fighter I can think of right now. To top it off, he defeated several quality opponents in his career, including Frazier and Norton. I got nothing but respect for Foreman.
With that said, this should not be taken as an insult toward the legend. Merely asking for some thoughts. You see, George had very horrible boxing skills. He would just plod forward and swing the arms like a caveman. He had monstrous power and a monstrous chin, as well as a great fighter heart, but his skills are absolutely horrible. Look how he fought Ali in the Rumble in the Jungle. Many casuals even think the fight was a set-up.
Is George Foreman the best ever example of "fokk skills, it's all about the physical gifts"?
With that said, this should not be taken as an insult toward the legend. Merely asking for some thoughts. You see, George had very horrible boxing skills. He would just plod forward and swing the arms like a caveman. He had monstrous power and a monstrous chin, as well as a great fighter heart, but his skills are absolutely horrible. Look how he fought Ali in the Rumble in the Jungle. Many casuals even think the fight was a set-up.
Is George Foreman the best ever example of "fokk skills, it's all about the physical gifts"?
Comment