Originally posted by Shadoww702
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Golovkin: No Big Fights at 168, I Make 160 Easy - I'm Not Big 160
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by bigdunny1 View PostSo much for 154 or 168. He said that like 4 years ago and been exposed refused to go down for canelo, refused to go up ward demanded a catchweight. Killed 2 major fights Because he refuses to budge on weight. And now says you 168 fighters calling me out have to wait till I'm ready to move up. Canelo tells him the same exact thing. But I guess everyone else has to move in weight for this clown who has done nothing in his career and can't sell ppvs. What a fraud.
Behave.
Andre was never in a position to fight him at SMW anyway, and everyone knows that Oscar doesn't want Canelo to face him yet.
Comment
-
I don't get why all the hate for the GGG. The man's a 160, he's not exactly straining to make the weight. Once he has all the belts I have no doubt he will step up. The SMW isn't exactly burstin with big money names and why the f*** should he move down to 154. If he was a 154 then he'd be fighting there.
Comment
-
Hopefully those who are quick to use the "hater" term now understand why many are skeptical about Trip and K2. There is just a lot of inconsistencies in the actions, statements, and comments from Team GGG. Ultimately what they have done is seek to make the most money while taking on the least amount of risk. I understand that, but their team seems to talk about lot of **** when other fighters do it. There has been ZERO attempt to build Trip as a fighter with his own PPV fans. Once the Lemieux fight bombed the focus has been on capitalizing off of other fighters popularity and following. So in a couple of weeks he will go to the UK to fight a fighter with a following there that poses minimal risk.
Comment
-
GGG's is basically saying that his whole legacy will be defined by one opponent, and that's Canelo Alvarez. Canelo is the only big money fight for him at 160. Lara would be a good name, but not a lot of money. As you can see, GGG "is businessman." Jack, DeGale, Ramirez, are good fights, but not good money. GGG is looking for, and has been looking for, GOOD MONEY!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ake-Dawg View PostHopefully those who are quick to use the "hater" term now understand why many are skeptical about Trip and K2. There is just a lot of inconsistencies in the actions, statements, and comments from Team GGG. Ultimately what they have done is seek to make the most money while taking on the least amount of risk. I understand that, but their team seems to talk about lot of **** when other fighters do it. There has been ZERO attempt to build Trip as a fighter with his own PPV fans. Once the Lemieux fight bombed the focus has been on capitalizing off of other fighters popularity and following. So in a couple of weeks he will go to the UK to fight a fighter with a following there that poses minimal risk.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ake-Dawg View PostHopefully those who are quick to use the "hater" term now understand why many are skeptical about Trip and K2. There is just a lot of inconsistencies in the actions, statements, and comments from Team GGG. Ultimately what they have done is seek to make the most money while taking on the least amount of risk. I understand that, but their team seems to talk about lot of **** when other fighters do it. There has been ZERO attempt to build Trip as a fighter with his own PPV fans. Once the Lemieux fight bombed the focus has been on capitalizing off of other fighters popularity and following. So in a couple of weeks he will go to the UK to fight a fighter with a following there that poses minimal risk.
dude they "SOUGHT" to fight a bunch of fights that didn't materialize. these were the supposedly higher risks. they wanted the fights! eubanks, canelo, cotto, martinez, sturm.
the brook fight is still a joke, but stop lying. i have no idea why it is that virtually none of you have it in you to do diligent research and be objective.
Comment
-
Comment