Comments Thread For: Froch Smiles, Explains Why Golovkin is NOT a Top 5 P4P Fighter

[Shadoww702]

the word "top" should be used so loosely..MW fugging sucks..everyone one of them who had a belt for teh last 2 years or so has now been ko'd or been ko'd before...yes there are punchers in the division, but besides that there is nothing..
if u want to call billy joe, eubank, and jacobs top i just cant rock with you on that

lets say the other "most known" mw or some **** like that

100% agree!!! The MW division is DOG SHT right now. When 5'5" ex-139 lb Cotto and ex139 lb CanYellow are ranked #2-3 you know it's a SHT division. FULL of C level fighters after Canelo, Cotto, GGG. And Canelo/Cotto can make 154 still. Unlike ANY TRU MW.

[Shadoww702]

Canelo is obviously targeting the last belt. He may or may not beat Saunders, he's getting the decision since he's not getting knocked out by Bj.

I think he'll move up after breaking the defense record, whether Canelo sacks up or not. But if there's an opportunity to fight a top SMw in the mean time, I expect theyd take it

That does look what Canelo is doing. He's trying to get a Saunders fight at the end of the year. He REALLY needs that belt if he's going to negotiate with GGG. I don't even think he can get a 70/30 split without a belt? Hell be lucky to get 50/50 without one. The splits are already set.Based on belt Rules. He needs that belt. I don't see GGG fighting any SMW anytime soon. He has TOO many mandatories to full fill. And had to write to the WBC just for the Brook fight. ZERO chance of any SMW this year and next.

[Shadoww702]

Top #3 P4P is easy.

1. Kov.
2. Chocalito
3. Ward

[hugh grant]

Its noit always just resume where you get your p4p ranking its how you deal with who you fight yoiu vcan only beasbeast what's in front of you if your peers duck you and say their not ready for you or want retirement payments! Nelos got a fantastic resume has he, yet none of them would likely hear final bell with GGG and nelo would make gggs resume look world beaters he'd make hard work of them

Kovslkev himself will tell youy its GGG who improved him

[hugh grant]

Clearly its not just resume as resume is dsubjective anyway. When PAC was beating Barrera and morales most would conclude PAC had beaten better fighters than Floyd. Yet I'm sure powers that be would have Floyd above PAC.?

Maybe because Floyd had no losses on his resume or whatever the reason was, GGG is unbesatren as well. And hasn't had controversial decisions like nelo.
Froich don't knoiw what he's talking about here and I like froch

[aboutfkntime]

You pathetic coward, you always say you can't duck anyone not in your weight class. You fat loser.

welcome to flip-flop central LMAO

[aboutfkntime]

GGG is one of the best middleweights in history...both in boxing ability and punching power.....that explains the envy of Froch.....Froch knows that the world watched him duck GGG....now he bad mouths GGG.....GGG has already said he would fight Froch at 168....why doesn't Froch put his money where his mouth is....because deep down Froch knows that GGG would lay a whipping on him..

[Madison Boxing]

hes one of the most dominant middleweights theres ever been

[aboutfkntime]

Yes, but what doesn't make sense is why the other top MW's are saying they need millions to take the risk of fighting GGG. What risk do they talk about? if GGG is beatable, he's an average fighter.

I don't get why they don't want it, if beating GGG means four belts.

don't be ridiculous, everyone is beatable

the fact that you think Golovkin is unbeatable makes you dumb

The fact that Golovkin has avoided everyone who is even close to a mover/spoiler, or world-class opponent..... makes me realize that Froch is probably right.

Top fighters/trainers/insiders know exactly how the game works, they can see that Golovkin is protected.

[aboutfkntime]

hes one of the most dominant middleweights theres ever been

he beat Murray, and Pepe..... you tool

when it comes to ATG discussion, you kids need to leave the room

there is only one qualification for greatness, ONE..... who you beat, with consideration given to when/how..... THAT IS IT, there is nothing else

adding in wankery..... like lineal titles, P4P rankings, ESPY awards, KO percentages against C-level opponents, etc, etc..... is simply ridiculous

WHO, with consideration given to WHEN and HOW !!

Murray, and Pepe Le Pew..... that's it.