Boxrec gives Bundu and Murray the same rating

[KingHippo]

He's a 4x world title challenger, with 3 close losses, 2 controversial. Pretty sure Bundu has never contested for a world title, at 41. Never been in any decent top 10 ranking etc. If you didn't like fight math, you shouldn't be reaching for the lowest form, boxrec points

Again, no word on skills.

Boxrec points are irrelevant, but since so many Golovkin trolls seem to think it is the bible, I like to get them at their own game.

Murray and Bundu are both b level fighters.

[j0zef]

...... did you say that Martin Murray are similar? Holy mother of god you're reaching far. This is such a huge reach there needs to be an Olympic event to see who can the biggest bull**** out of their ass.

Just for the sake of this asinine argument, let's completely ignore that Bundu is 41. Let's ignore that Martin's rating is in his 2nd weight class. Let's ignore that Bundu's highlight was a split decision win over Frankie Gavin. Let's ignore that these fights took place 18 months apart, and that Murray was #6 rated MW when Golovkin fought him.

But unless I'm blind, Murray on a losing streak is still the 11th ranked SMW while Bundu was 29th and is now 37th.


And who in the bloody hell uses boxrec as the bible for the ratings? Show me any fan, Golovkin or otherwise, who treats boxrec as anything but a quick reference and you get a cookie.

Seriously, there are so many stupid threads started on NSB whose main premise is based on nothing but thin air. This is one of them.

[KingHippo]

Again you ****er, you didn't say anything about Murray's skills, because you can't identify them. You just like every other casual out there.

Can you tell me what Murray does that is so extraordinary?

[1hourRun]

Thanks for the laughs KingHippo the Golovtards are eating it up.

[The Comic DON]

Again you ****er, you didn't say anything about Murray's skills, because you can't identify them. You just like every other casual out there.

Can you tell me what Murray does that is so extraordinary?

Solid chin, big for a middleweight, good gas tank, tough, solid defense, quick hands, and a firm grasp on the art of boxing.

Some fighters just aren't spectacular in one area but make up for it in a variety of ways. That's why Murray was able to climb the rankings and challenge for world titles on 4 separate occasions and arguably only lost one of them.

Bundu isn't really in the same league. When Bundu stepped up he was blown out both times.

[KingHippo]

Thanks for the laughs KingHippo the Golovtards are eating it up.

They hate the truth really. Murray is only slightly better than Bundu. But he's no legend. He only became a legend when GGG beat him.

[KingHippo]

Solid chin, big for a middleweight, good gas tank, tough, solid defense, quick hands, and a firm grasp on the art of boxing.

Some fighters just aren't spectacular in one area but make up for it in a variety of ways. That's why Murray was able to climb the rankings and challenge for world titles on 4 separate occasions and arguably only lost one of them.

Bundu isn't really in the same league. When Bundu stepped up he was blown out both times.

Murray does have better defense than Bundu, but Bundu has faster hands. He's also very durable. Murray has better punch selection and slightly more power than Bundu, but that's about it. He's not head and shoulders above Bundu.

[HeroBando]

They hate the truth really. Murray is only slightly better than Bundu. But he's no legend. He only became a legend when GGG beat him.

Nobody said Murray is a legend, you just keep making things up to cover up for embarrassment over this pitiful thread.

[boxinggod101]

Fail thread. Yes GGG hasnt beaten a big name and shouldnt be a top 5 P4P but ur thread is just dumb.

[The Comic DON]

Murray does have better defense than Bundu, but Bundu has faster hands. He's also very durable. Murray has better punch selection and slightly more power than Bundu, but that's about it. He's not head and shoulders above Bundu.

Bundu has some tools but at the weight, he's relatively small. his best win is Frankie Gavin who after losing to Brook went down to 140. Murray while unspectacular still had size at middleweight. That's why one was able to challenge for titles and stay competitive and the other was blown out by a prospect.