Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Kessler vs. Golovkin at 168lbs

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by Scary View Post
    Haha what?! Froch didn'nt win the second one easy, it was a very close fight - Go back and watch it, get the intel, get back to me.

    Other than that yeah, Kessler lost a close decision in Cardiff to Joe Calzaghe, but gave him a run for his money the first half of the fight - And yeah, Ward headbuttet Kessler into some optical nerve damage, during the fight and you act like it was just this clean swipe. You really gotta look at fights and pay close attention, because right now, you just a fanboy who got owned by a hypetrain - Come fightnight, Brook'll show how badly GGG can handle boxers.
    im fully expecting brook to give him trouble, is being underestimated for this fight. It was a convincing win, guess it wasnt 'easy' but was a clear winner. Again calzaghe won convincingly too. I dont see anything from watching kessler, or his CV that makes me think he was an 'A' class fighter

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by Scary View Post
      Haha what?! Froch didn'nt win the second one easy, it was a very close fight - Go back and watch it, get the intel, get back to me.

      Other than that yeah, Kessler lost a close decision in Cardiff to Joe Calzaghe, but gave him a run for his money the first half of the fight - And yeah, Ward headbuttet Kessler into some optical nerve damage, during the fight and you act like it was just this clean swipe. You really gotta look at fights and pay close attention, because right now, you just a fanboy who got owned by a hypetrain - Come fightnight, Brook'll show how badly GGG can handle boxers.
      Lol, Brook gonna beat Golovkin now? You really gonna throw yer **** out on that eh? I see you got a spot saved in your sig for bets. Name it.

      Comment


      • #53
        Golovkin doesn't even have a win as good as Kessler's win against Andrade, lol, Andrade was undefeated and would go on to defeat Robert Stieglitz and almost defeat Lucian Bute and he was far bigger, stronger and tougher than any Golovkin opponent.

        LOL.

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by TheBoxingXpert View Post
          Golovkin doesn't even have a win as good as Kessler's win against Andrade, lol, Andrade was undefeated and would go on to defeat Robert Stieglitz and almost defeat Lucian Bute and he was far bigger, stronger and tougher than any Golovkin opponent.
          Wait, your giving credit to Kessler for almost beating someone, thats where we are now?

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by Sun_Tzu View Post
            Lol, Brook gonna beat Golovkin now? You really gonna throw yer **** out on that eh? I see you got a spot saved in your sig for bets. Name it.
            I didn't say that, all I mean is that I believe Kell Brook is gonna showcase all the many mistakes the defence game of GGG. He might still get KO'd, but he gonna illuminate the flaws of GGG and make it a tough affair I'm sure.

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by Sun_Tzu View Post
              Wait, your giving credit to Kessler for almost beating someone, thats where we are now?
              Nope, I'm not saying that Andrade is a great win. But comparable to any win on Golovkin's record, then yeah, the Andrade win looks good.

              Which of Golovkin's opponents would be able to beat Stieglitz, almost KO Bute and go the distance against Kessler? Andrade is far bigger, stronger and tougher than any of Golovkin's opponents. You agree on that, right?

              And Andrade is not even Kessler's best win. His best win is Froch.

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by Scary View Post
                I didn't say that, all I mean is that I believe Kell Brook is gonna showcase all the many mistakes the defence game of GGG. He might still get KO'd, but he gonna illuminate the flaws of GGG and make it a tough affair I'm sure.
                I also feel like Kell will be in it for a bit, doesnt mean he belongs in the ring with Golovkin. He doesnt, you guys need to check your hate at the door. It really makes talking boxing with any of you pointless. Im not talking to you specifcally. I can understand not liking a fighter but denying the guy his due is childish. I didnt like Floyd, still dont but you wont ever see me trying to downplay his skills as a boxer.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by TheBoxingXpert View Post
                  Nope, I'm not saying that Andrade is a great win. But comparable to any win on Golovkin's record, then yeah, the Andrade win looks good.

                  Which of Golovkin's opponents would be able to beat Stieglitz, almost KO Bute and go the distance against Kessler? Andrade is far bigger, stronger and tougher than any of Golovkin's opponents. You agree on that, right?

                  And Andrade is not even Kessler's best win. His best win is Froch.
                  I dont know, you are comparing smws and lhws to a mw. You see where this has gone now? Kessler cant beat Golovkin, we can go round and round but you know its true. He is a special fighter, Kovalev and Ward are special fighters. There arent very many of them and they dont last long. Why not enjoy them while they are here and performing instead of trying to tear them down? It makes no sense to me at all.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by Sun_Tzu View Post
                    I dont know, you are comparing smws and lhws to a mw. You see where this has gone now? Kessler cant beat Golovkin, we can go round and round but you know its true. He is a special fighter, Kovalev and Ward are special fighters. There arent very many of them and they dont last long. Why not enjoy them while they are here and performing instead of trying to tear them down? It makes no sense to me at all.
                    Golovkin is a special fighter, yes, but so was Froch and Kessler. They were just more proven than Golovkin is. How can you rate Golovkin so highly purely based on how good he looks in beating small weak guys at 160lbs? Geale? LMFAO. Even small old shot welterweight Cotto destroyed Geale easily.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by TheBoxingXpert View Post
                      Golovkin is a special fighter, yes, but so was Froch and Kessler. They were just more proven than Golovkin is. How can you rate Golovkin so highly purely based on how good he looks in beating small weak guys at 160lbs? Geale? LMFAO. Even small old shot welterweight Cotto destroyed Geale easily.
                      Because I see his technique. I see him change the flow of fights when its not going the way he wants it to. He is not the one dimensional slugger he is made out to be. He is highly skilled, to the point that no body wants to fight him. Canelo dropped a belt and his balls rather than fight him. Kell Brook came out of nowhere with balls the size of a 67 chrysler and said *** it, you boys dont want it Ill give it a go and god bless him. Ill be honest with you there is a big part of me thats rooting for Kell Brook because thats the kind of mfers we need in boxing now. Golovkin like every other fighter has a short window of dominance, some windows are bigger than others. He will lose eventually and people like you will say, "see he wasnt about *****" while sitting behind your computer drinking a double IPA thinking you have the slightest clue what it takes to get where he was. To answer your question, if you were the boxing expert you claim to be you would have never asked me that question.

                      And yes, Froch and Kessler were special fighters. You dont get to where they were with out being special. They dont beat Golovkin though. I honestly feel like if he was younger he would have been a mfer at smw.
                      Last edited by Sun_Tzu; 08-13-2016, 06:00 AM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP