Canelo's bad situation

[Doctor_Tenma]

People who say "he was running!", "he was only going backwards!", etc., etc., are mainly idiots who don't understand the technical aspects of the sport. Hit and don't get hit. Hate it or love it. Canelo was missing all night and while Lara's jabs and potshots were weak, they were plenty and they were clear. Canelo had nothing to offer that night and you have been brainwashed by that ****sexual fool called De La Hoya. He is feeding you this Canelo **** to make money.

I don't know, can I safely say he was doing a whole lot of moving without punching then? It's bad enough that he didn't even counter when he made Canelo miss. What can I call it then?

[cork]

How can Lara win when he was literally running backwards all night. He lost and handily. Floyd schooled him and he stood in the pocket and wasn't back peddling

If you watch the Floyd fight again it was funny because canelo was getting pressured and waking backwards against Floyd of all people. I'm not sure how good canelo us but then again I'm not sure how good most of those 154 160 ponders are either. Only thing I know for sure is that ggg would be at least a 5/1 favorite against all of them.

[caezito]

You are right

1: Yes, he did. You don't score a fight according to the sound of the audience, but according to who controls the fight. Lara proved to be the technically superior boxer, but everyone knows how protected Canelo is now, so Lara would up his game further in a rematch.

2: Based on what? Based on struggling against a small old Cotto who had done nothing for years, except getting schooled by Trout and beating a cripple? Last time I made a wrong prediction was when I predicted that Canelo would KO Cotto. Since then, I lost all respect for him. There's no excuse that he wasn't able to KO Cotto.

And doesn't it mean anything to you that Canelo not only lost to Mayweather, but was his easiest victory in many, many years, easier than even Guerrero? Mayweather won every round clearly and exposed Canelo as the technically limited and flawed fighter that he is.

NO Top Boxer will lost again Canelo

[Greed.]

The Charlo's can't beat Canelo. I would only favour Andrade and Golovkin over him.

[elgu]

Canelo is in a real crisis. He's stuck between 154lbs and 160lbs. He can fight in both weight classes, but both of them are full of guys who can beat him.

At 154lbs, he would lose to Andrade, Charlo 1, Charlo 2 and Lara (who got robbed in their first fight).

At 160lbs, he would lose to Golovkin, Saunders, Eubank and Jacobs.

He can keep fighting small guys like Cotto and Khan or fight shot fighters like Kirkland or irrelevant fighters like Angulo, but sooner or later, the ******ed Mexicans will realize that something's wrong.

He can't go beneath 154lbs. And while he CAN go above 160lbs, he would lose to everyone there, so that's a no-go. In other words, he's stuck between 154lbs and 160lbs and there is 8 fighters there who can beat him. Time is ticking, fat ginger...

I only see him losing to Golovkin and Saunders, the rest he beats.

Lol at Canelo losing to a Charlo.

Canelo's only crisis is that he won't be the big star he is right now if he continues ducking. He's supposed to be the face of the sport.

[Dean_Razorback]

canelo beats both charlos and probably most of PBC 154 pounders

[FrankieClutch]

No way in hell do the Charlo's beat him. Andrade would have the best chance at 154 and I would still favor Canelo in that fight.

Matter of fact, the only guy I would favor over Canelo at either weight class would be GGG

[torosboxing75]

Canelo's screwed lol..no where to go

[Chuckguy]

People who say "he was running!", "he was only going backwards!", etc., etc., are mainly idiots who don't understand the technical aspects of the sport. Hit and don't get hit. Hate it or love it. Canelo was missing all night and while Lara's jabs and potshots were weak, they were plenty and they were clear. Canelo had nothing to offer that night and you have been brainwashed by that ****sexual fool called De La Hoya. He is feeding you this Canelo **** to make money.

Well in that case I can beat all the top fighters I'll just jab jab jab run backward jab jab jab run backwards
That was running not boxing.
Mayweather Whittaker sugar ray that's boxing that's swimming without getting wet

[Real King Kong]

1. Lara wasn't robbed.

2. I give Canelo a chance against anyone at 154 and 160 and he'd probably be favorite in a lot of those fights.

If anyone is in a tough spot it's GGG. 34 years old and a loss might be a death sentence. Canelo is 26 and still young. Most don't even count the loss against Mayweather against him since he was young and May is an ATG.

1: Yes, he did. You don't score a fight according to the sound of the audience, but according to who controls the fight. Lara proved to be the technically superior boxer, but everyone knows how protected Canelo is now, so Lara would up his game further in a rematch.

2: Based on what? Based on struggling against a small old Cotto who had done nothing for years, except getting schooled by Trout and beating a cripple? Last time I made a wrong prediction was when I predicted that Canelo would KO Cotto. Since then, I lost all respect for him. There's no excuse that he wasn't able to KO Cotto.

And doesn't it mean anything to you that Canelo not only lost to Mayweather, but was his easiest victory in many, many years, easier than even Guerrero? Mayweather won every round clearly and exposed Canelo as the technically limited and flawed fighter that he is.

Yeah, like predicting the result of every damn fight before it happens? Educating the community?

Sounds like you got canelo vs lara wrong.

Educating the community...like when you said sugar ray leonard was a top 3 middleweight all time?